scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Carl V. Thompson published in 1985"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a model for growth of secondary grains into a uniform matrix of columnar normal grains is presented, which indicates that secondary grain growth rates should increase with grain boundary energy, surface energy anisotropy, grain boundary mobility, and temperature.
Abstract: Secondary grain growth in thin films can lead to grain sizes much greater than the film thickness. Surface energy anisotropy often provides an important fraction of the driving force for secondary grain growth, especially in the early stages of growth. Surface‐energy‐driven secondary grain growth leads to the development of large grains with restricted crystallographic textures. A model is presented for growth of secondary grains into a uniform matrix of columnar normal grains. The model indicates that secondary grain growth rates should increase with grain boundary energy, surface energy anisotropy, grain boundary mobility, and temperature. While final secondary grain sizes will decrease with film thickness, their growth rates will increase. The final secondary grain sizes and orientations will be strongly affected by grain sizes and orientations in the initial film. The models presented here provide analytical tools for experimental study of secondary grain growth in thin films. They will be used in for...

263 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply rate theory to the analysis of grain boundary motion, grain growth, and recrystallization in thin metallic and semiconductor films and show that surface energy minimization plays an important role in driving their preferential growth.
Abstract: Normal grain growth in thin films leads to columnar grains with sizes roughly equal to the film thickness. In subsequent grain growth, a minor fraction of the grains continue to grow at appreciable rates, leading initially to a bimodal grain size distribution and ultimately to a monomodal distribution of grains with sizes much larger than the film thickness. Those grains which continue to grow, secondary grains, often have uniform or restricted texture, suggesting that in such cases surface energy minimization plays an important role in driving their preferential growth. Surface-energy-driven secondary grain growth can, in principle, lead to single crystal films. Turnbull and co-workers were among the first to apply rate theory to the analysis of grain boundary motion, grain growth, and recrystallization. These models have been adapted to describe surface-energy-driven secondary grain growth in thin films. Recent experiments on secondary grain growth in thin metallic and semiconductor films are reviewed. It has been shown that film thickness, film composition and surface topography have pronounced effects on growth rates, final grain sizes and orientations.

8 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Secondary grain growth in thin Au films on SiO2 substrates with periodic surface relief structures was studied as a model for the application of graphoepitaxy (the growth of orientated crystalline films through the use of artificial surface patterning) as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Secondary grain growth in thin Au films on SiO2 substrates with periodic surface relief structures was studied as a model for the application of graphoepitaxy (the growth of orientated crystalline films through the use of artificial surface patterning). Secondary grain growth driven by surface energy anisotropy produces grains many times larger than the film thickness with uniform texture. In thin films of Au on SiO2, surface-energy-driven secondary grain growth was found to occur at room temperature as soon as the film becomes continuous, and was shown to be responsible for the {111} deposition texture. A square-wave-profile grating of 0.2 µm period, etched into the surface of the substrate, resulted in preferred growth of {111}-textured grains with 〈112〉 directions oriented parallel to the grating axis. It is proposed that surface energy minimization is responsible for this phenomenon.

7 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the enhancement of grain growth in 50 nm-thick Ge films during Ge ion bombardment, or self-implantation, at 500-600 °C was reported.
Abstract: We report the enhancement of grain growth in 50 nm-thick Ge films during Ge ion bombardment, or self-implantation, at 500–600 ° C. Conventional and cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) indicate that normal grains grow to a columnar structure at considerably lower temperatures than during ordinary thermal annealing. Furthermore, self-implantation-enhanced normal grain growth is found to be very weakly dependent on temperature. The time dependence and temperature dependence of grain growth during self-implantation were compared with data for thermal annealing experiments and suggest that the enhancement results from elastic collisions between ions and atoms located at the grain boundaries.

3 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, it was found that n-type dopants, phosphorous and arsenic, markedly enhance the rate of secondary grain growth as seen through a lowering of the temperature required for significant growth.
Abstract: Secondary or abnormal grain growth has been observed in ultrathin films of silicon ( 50x) and which have uniform (111) texture. This abnormal grain growth is believed to be driven, in part, by surface energy minimization and hence is termed surface-energy-driven secondary grain growth. It was found that n-type dopants, phosphorous and arsenic, markedly enhance the rate of secondary grain growth as seen through a lowering of the temperature required for significant growth. On the other hand, boron (a p-type dopant) appears to neither markedly increase nor decrease the rate of grain growth. Enhancement caused by phosphorous or arsenic is thought to stem from increases in the mobility of the grain boundaries. Enhancement of grain boundary mobility was found to be compensated (reduced or eliminated) by additional doping with boron.

1 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Two approaches to preparing oriented crystalline films on amorphous substrates are reviewed briefly: zonemelting recrystallization (ZMR) and surface energy-driven grain growth (SEDGG).
Abstract: Two approaches to preparing oriented crystalline films on amorphous substrates are reviewed briefly: zone-melting recrystallization (ZMR) and surface-energy-driven grain growth (SEDGG). In both approaches patterning can be employed either to establish orientation or to control the location of defects. ZMR has been highly successful for the growth of Si films on oxidized Si substrates, but its applicability is limited by the high temperatures required. SEDGG has been investigated as a potentially universal, low temperature approach. It has been demonstrated in Si, Ge, and Au. Surface gratings favor the growth of grains with a specific in-plane orientation. In order for SEDGG to be of broad practical value, the mobility of semiconductor grain boundaries must be increased substantially. Mobility enhancement has been achieved via doping and ion bombardment.