scispace - formally typeset
C

Catherine C. Marshall

Researcher at Texas A&M University

Publications -  152
Citations -  7509

Catherine C. Marshall is an academic researcher from Texas A&M University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Digital library & Hypertext. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 150 publications receiving 7344 citations. Previous affiliations of Catherine C. Marshall include FX Palo Alto Laboratory & University of Texas at Austin.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Annotation: from paper books to the digital library

TL;DR: The practice of annotation in a particular situation is examined: the markings students make in university-level textbooks, and their status within a community of fellow textbook readers is examined.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation

TL;DR: This paper first characterizes annotation according to a set of dimensions to situate a long-term study of a community of annotators and explores the implications of annotative practice for hypertext concepts and for the development of an ecology of hypertext annotation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, EmergingThemes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations inInteractive Systems

TL;DR: It is posed that, while it is impossible to remove all formalisms from computing systems, system designers need to match the level of formal expression entailed with the goals and situation of the users -- a design criteria not commonly mentioned in current interface design.
Journal ArticleDOI

Spatial hypertext: designing for change

TL;DR: Hypertext1 allows content to appear in different contexts and authors collect and structure materials to reflect their own understanding or in anticipation of readers’ possible interests, needs, or ability to comprehend the substrate of interrelated content.
Journal ArticleDOI

Going digital: a look at assumptions underlying digital libraries

TL;DR: It is argued that current efforts to create digital libraries are limited by a largely unexamined and unintended allegiance to an idealized view of what libraries have been, rather than what they actually are or could be.