C
Christopher K. Hsee
Researcher at University of Chicago
Publications - 144
Citations - 25934
Christopher K. Hsee is an academic researcher from University of Chicago. The author has contributed to research in topics: Happiness & Preference. The author has an hindex of 59, co-authored 139 publications receiving 24101 citations. Previous affiliations of Christopher K. Hsee include University of Hawaii & Yale University.
Papers
More filters
Posted Content
Risk as Feelings
TL;DR: It is shown that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks, and when such divergence occurs, emotional reactions often drive behavior.
Journal ArticleDOI
Risk as feelings.
TL;DR: This article proposed the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, which highlights the role of affect experienced at the moment of decision making, and showed that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks.
Posted Content
The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives
TL;DR: The authors investigates a particular type of preference reversal (PR), existing between joint evaluation, where two stimulus options are evaluated side by side simultaneously, and separate evaluation,where these option are evaluated separately.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives☆
TL;DR: The authors investigates a particular type of preference reversal (PR), existing between joint evaluation, where two stimulus options are evaluated side by side simultaneously, and separate evaluation where these option are evaluated separately.
Posted Content
Cross-cultural Differences in Risk Perception,but Cross-cultural Similarities in Attitudes Towards Perceived Risk
TL;DR: The authors found that respondents from the P.R.C., U.S.A., Germany, and Poland were significantly less risk-averse in their pricing than Americans when risk preference was assessed in the traditional expected utility framework.