scispace - formally typeset
C

Cynthia Lum

Researcher at George Mason University

Publications -  96
Citations -  3889

Cynthia Lum is an academic researcher from George Mason University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Law enforcement & Crime prevention. The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 92 publications receiving 3234 citations. Previous affiliations of Cynthia Lum include Northeastern University & University of Maryland, College Park.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Reinventing American Policing

Cynthia Lum, +1 more
- 01 Jan 2017 - 
TL;DR: Two principles should form the bedrock for effective policing in a democratic society: crime averted, not arrests made, should be the primary metric for judging police effectiveness and citizens' views about the police and their tactics for preventing crime and disorder matter independently of police effectiveness as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Body‐worn cameras’ effects on police officers and citizen behavior: A systematic review

TL;DR: The authors found that BWCs do not seem to affect other police and citizen behaviors in a consistent manner, including self-initiated activities or arrest behaviors, dispatched calls for service, or assaults and resistance against police officers, but it is unclear whether this finding signals an improvement in the quality of police-citizen interactions or a change in reporting.
Journal ArticleDOI

When can we Conclude that Treatments or Programs “Don’t Work”?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine common practices of reporting statistically nonsignificant findings in criminal justice evaluation studies and find that criminal justice evaluators often make formal errors in the reporting of statistically non-significant results.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding the Limits of Technology’s Impact on Police Effectiveness:

TL;DR: In this article, technology has become a major source of expenditure and innovation in law enforcement and is assumed to hold great potential for enhancing police work. But does technology achieve these expectation?
Journal ArticleDOI

Why do evaluation researchers in crime and justice choose non-experimental methods?

TL;DR: Despite the general theoretical support for the value and use of randomized controlled experiments in determining "what works" in criminal justice interventions, they are infrequently used in practice as mentioned in this paper, due to the difficulty and ethical challenges of conducting experiments.