D
Daniele Nardi
Researcher at Sapienza University of Rome
Publications - 382
Citations - 18489
Daniele Nardi is an academic researcher from Sapienza University of Rome. The author has contributed to research in topics: Robot & Mobile robot. The author has an hindex of 47, co-authored 364 publications receiving 17602 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniele Nardi include University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee & Selex ES.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Evaluating tangible paradigms for ground robot teleoperation
TL;DR: An extensive experimental evaluation of motion sensing interaction paradigms implemented on TUIs for the teleoperation of ground robots and a detailed discussion of the results in terms of mission-related performance, environment conditions, robot operation degree, and human cognitive effort are presented.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Tangible interfaces for robot teleoperation
TL;DR: The main benefits of TUIs for robot teleoperation in a urban search and rescue task are identified and an evaluation framework is provided to allow for an effective comparison of tangible interfaces with other input devices.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Multi-robot search for a moving target: Integrating world modeling, task assignment and context
TL;DR: A novel approach is contributed to coordination within a team of cooperative autonomous robots that need to accomplish a common goal by dynamically adapting the underlying task assignment and distributed world representation, based on the current state of the environment.
Hough transform based localization for mobile robots
Luca Iocchi,Daniele Nardi +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a self-localization method based on matching a geometric reference map with a representation of range information acquired by the robot's sensors is presented, which is quite adequate for indoor environments and is suitable for those environments that can be represented by a set of segments.
Book ChapterDOI
A Uniform Tableaux Method for Nonmonotonic Modal Logics
TL;DR: This method is parametric with respect to both the modal logic and the preference semantics, since it handles in a uniform way the entailment problem for a wide class of nonmonotonic modal logics: McDermott and Doyle's logics and ground logics.