To cope with environmental fluctuations and to prevent invasion by pathogens, plant metabolism must be flexible and dynamic. Active oxygen species, whose formation is accelerated under stress conditions, must be rapidly processed if oxidative damage is to be averted. The lifetime of active oxygen species within the cellular environment is determined by the antioxidative system, which provides crucial protection against oxidative damage. The antioxidative system comprises numerous enzymes and compounds of low molecular weight. While research into the former has benefited greatly from advances in molecular technology, the pathways by which the latter are synthesized have received comparatively little attention. The present review emphasizes the roles of ascorbate and glutathione in plant metabolism and stress tolerance. We provide a detailed account of current knowledge of the biosynthesis, compartmentation, and transport of these two important antioxidants, with emphasis on the unique insights and advances gained by molecular exploration.

ASCORBATE AND GLUTATHIONE: Keeping Active Oxygen Under Control

Rapid generation of superoxide and accumulation of H2O2 is a characteristic early feature of the hypersensitive response following perception of pathogen avirulence signals. Emerging data indicate that the oxidative burst reflects activation of a membrane-bound NADPH oxidase closely resembling that operating in activated neutrophils. The oxidants are not only direct protective agents, but H2O2 also functions as a substrate for oxidative cross-linking in the cell wall, as a threshold trigger for hypersensitive cell death, and as a diffusible signal for induction of cellular protectant genes in surrounding cells. Activation of the oxidative burst is a central component of a highly amplified and integrated signal system, also involving salicylic acid and perturbations of cytosolic Ca2+, which underlies the expression of disease-resistance mechanisms.

The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance

In the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), secretory and transmembrane proteins fold into their native conformation and undergo posttranslational modifications important for their activity and structure. When protein folding in the ER is inhibited, signal transduction pathways, which increase the biosynthetic capacity and decrease the biosynthetic burden of the ER to maintain the homeostasis of this organelle, are activated. These pathways are called the unfolded protein response (UPR). In this review, we briefly summarize principles of protein folding and molecular chaperone function important for a mechanistic understanding of UPR-signaling events. We then discuss mechanisms of signal transduction employed by the UPR in mammals and our current understanding of the remodeling of cellular processes by the UPR. Finally, we summarize data that demonstrate that UPR signaling feeds into decision making in other processes previously thought to be unrelated to ER function, e.g., eukaryotic starvation responses and differentiation programs.

The mammalian unfolded protein response

Inducible defense-related proteins have been described in many plant species upon infection with oomycetes, fungi, bacteria, or viruses, or insect attack. Several types of proteins are common and have been classified into 17 families of pathogenesis-related proteins (PRs). Others have so far been found to occur more specifically in some plant species. Most PRs and related proteins are induced through the action of the signaling compounds salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, or ethylene, and possess antimicrobial activities in vitro through hydrolytic activities on cell walls, contact toxicity, and perhaps an involvement in defense signaling. However, when expressed in transgenic plants, they reduce only a limited number of diseases, depending on the nature of the protein, plant species, and pathogen involved. As exemplified by the PR-1 proteins in Arabidopsis and rice, many homologous proteins belonging to the same family are regulated developmentally and may serve different functions in specific organs or tissues. Several defense-related proteins are induced during senescence, wounding or cold stress, and some possess antifreeze activity. Many defense-related proteins are present constitutively in floral tissues and a substantial number of PR-like proteins in pollen, fruits, and vegetables can provoke allergy in humans. The evolutionary conservation of similar defense-related proteins in monocots and dicots, but also their divergent occurrence in other conditions, suggest that these proteins serve essential functions in plant life, whether in defense or not.

/pdf/significance-of-inducible-defense-related-proteins-in-1xu2abfq16.pdf

Significance of Inducible Defense-related Proteins in Infected Plants

Plants are constantly being challenged by aspiring pathogens, but disease is rare. Why? Broadly, there are three reasons for pathogen failure. Either (1) the plant is unable to support the niche requirements of a potential pathogen and is thus a non? host; or (2) the plant possesses preformed structural barriers or toxic compounds that confine successful infections to specialized pathogen species; or (3) upon recognition of the attacking pathogen, defense mechanisms are elaborated and the invasion remains localized. All three types of interaction are said to be incompatible, but only the latter resistance mech? anism depends on induced responses. Successful pathogen invasion and disease (compatibility) ensue if the preformed plant defenses are inappropriate, the plant does not detect the pathogen, or the activated defense responses are ineffective. In this review, we examine the essential prerequisites for patho? gen recognition and the induction of localized defense responses. Preformed defenses are considered elsewhere in this issue (see Osbourn, 1996, in this issue). Race-specific pathogen recognition is hypothesized to re? sult from the direct or indirect interaction of the product of a dominant or semidominant plant resistance (R) gene with a product derived from the corresponding dominant pathogen avirulence (Avr) gene (Keen, 1992; Staskawicz et al., 1995). Subsequent signal transduction events are assumed to coordinate the activation of an array of defense responses. This "simple" model appears to explain much but begs many questions. For example, R gene products are likely to provide key components for recognition, but how do the distinct classes of R proteins characterized to date (see Bent, 1996, in this is? sue) activate the defense response? Do different R gene classes activate distinct responses? The regulation of some components of defense mechanisms has been studied in plant cell cultures in response to non-race-specific elicitors, but to what extent do such studies provide a model for R gene func? tion? Plant resistance is often correlated with the activation of specific defense responses, but which (if any) are required to abolish or retard pathogen growth, and how? Which are pri? mary responses and which are secondary? Does the first response involve transcriptional regulation, the activation of preformed enzymes, and/or the opening of ion channels, or

Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses.

Active oxygen species (AOS) are believed to have important roles in plants in general and in plant—pathogen interactions in particular. They are believed to be involved in signal transduction, cell wall reinforcement, hypersensitive response (HR) and phytoalexin production, and to have direct antimicrobial effects. Since current methods are inadequate for localizing AOS in intact plant tissue, most studies have been conducted using cell suspension culture/elicitors systems. 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) polymerizes instantly and locally as soon as it comes into contact with H2O2 in the presence of peroxidase, and it was found that, by allowing the leaf to take up this substrate, in-vivo and in-situ detection of H2O2 can be made at subcellular levels. This method was successfully used to detect H2O2 in developing papillae and surrounding haloes (cell wall appositions) and whole cells of barley leaves interacting with the powdery mildew fungus. Thus, H2O2 can be detected in the epidermal cell wall subjacent to the primary germ tube from 6 h after inoculation, and subjacent to the appressorium from 15 h. The earliest time point for observation of H2O2 in relation to epidermal cells undergoing HR is 15 h after inoculation, first appearing in the zones of attachment to the mesophyll cells underneath, and eventually in the entire epidermal cell. Furthermore, it was observed that proteins in papillae and HR cells are cross-linked, a process believed to be fuelled by H2O2. This cross-linking reinforces the apposition, presumably assisting the arrest of the pathogen.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.11061187.x

Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley—powdery mildew interaction

Plant chitinases

The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by the consumption of molecular oxygen during host–pathogen interactions is termed the oxidative burst. The most important ROS are singlet oxygen (1O2), the hydroxyperoxyl radical (HO2·), the superoxide anion \(\left( {{\text{O}}_{\text{2}} ^ - } \right)\), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), the hydroxyl radical (OH-) and the closely related reactive nitrogen species, nitric oxide (NO). These ROS are highly reactive, and therefore toxic, and participate in several important processes related to defence and infection. Furthermore, ROS also play important roles in plant biology both as toxic by-products of aerobic metabolism and as key regulators of growth, development and defence pathways. In this review, we will assess the different roles of ROS in host–pathogen interactions with special emphasis on fungal and Oomycete pathogens.

/pdf/roles-of-reactive-oxygen-species-in-interactions-between-4k7cv36jru.pdf

Roles of reactive oxygen species in interactions between plants and pathogens

Germin-like oxalate oxidase is an oligomeric enzyme which generates H2O2. This paper reports increased activity of this enzyme in association with the response of barley to the powdery mildew fungus, Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei. The increase is detected in a colorimetric assay as well as on activity blots using extracts of both resistant and susceptible leaves. The increase is generally apparent from 24 h after inoculation. From 48 h after inoculation, there is an approximately 10-fold higher oxalate oxidase activity in the samples from inoculated plants compared with the controls. The oxalate oxidase activity increase appears 1–3 days earlier than PR-1 protein accumulation. SDS—PAGE analysis suggests that this pathogen-response oxalate oxidase is different from a commercially available barley oxalate oxidase, and from a constitutive barley root oxalate oxidase.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.08010139.x

Germin-like oxalate oxidase, a H2O2-producing enzyme, accumulates in barley attacked by the powdery mildew fungus

Summary
• Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is reported to inhibit biotrophic but benefit necrotrophic pathogens. Infection by necrotrophs can result in a massive accumulation of H2O2 in hosts. Little is known of how pathogens with both growth types are affected (hemibiotrophs). The hemibiotroph, Septoria tritici, infecting wheat (Triticum aestivum) is inhibited by H2O2 during the biotrophic phase, but a large H2O2 accumulation occurs in the host during reproduction.
• Here, we infiltrated catalase, H2O2 or water into wheat during the biotrophic or the necrotrophic phase of S. tritici and studied the effect of infection on host physiology to get an understanding of the survival strategy of the pathogen.
• H2O2 removal by catalase at both early and late stages made plants more susceptible, whereas H2O2 made them more resistant. H2O2 is harmful to S. tritici throughout its life cycle, but it can be tolerated.
• The late accumulation of H2O2 is unlikely to result from down-regulation of photosynthesis, but probably originates from damage to the peroxisomes during the general tissue collapse, which is accompanied by release of soluble sugars in a susceptible cultivar.

David B. Collinge

Papers

Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley—powdery mildew interaction

Plant chitinases

Roles of reactive oxygen species in interactions between plants and pathogens

Germin-like oxalate oxidase, a H2O2-producing enzyme, accumulates in barley attacked by the powdery mildew fungus

Role of hydrogen peroxide during the interaction between the hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen Septoria tritici and wheat.