scispace - formally typeset
D

David C. Schwebel

Researcher at University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications -  395
Citations -  123784

David C. Schwebel is an academic researcher from University of Alabama at Birmingham. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Injury prevention. The author has an hindex of 72, co-authored 358 publications receiving 93565 citations. Previous affiliations of David C. Schwebel include University of California, Los Angeles & University of Iowa.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Using smartphone technology to deliver a virtual pedestrian environment: usability and validation

TL;DR: A smartphone-based virtual environment can be usable and valid and anticipated correlations between personality and kiosk virtual reality pedestrian behavior emerged for the smartphone- based system.
Journal ArticleDOI

Design and Feasibility of a Safe Pill Bottle

TL;DR: Preliminary results demonstrate that smart pill bottles may be an effective tool to prevent unintentional child poisoning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improve traffic death statistics in China

TL;DR: The structure of this contingency could be similar to the snapback mechanism in Article 37 of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran, and North Korea will insist on similar guarantees if it dismantles its nuclear weapons.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using interactive virtual presence to support accurate installation of child restraints: Efficacy and parental perceptions

TL;DR: Interactive virtual presence between certified CPS technicians and the public via smartphone app has potential to improve proper child restraint installations broadly, including to vulnerable and underserved rural populations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategies of Verbal Dueling: How College Students Win a Verbal Battle

TL;DR: This article used ethnographic data collection techniques, conversations that transpired in the dining hall of a college dormitory were recorded to identify verbal dueling among students, and examples of duel segments were provided, interspersed with an analysis and discussion of strategies duelers and audience members use to influence other conversants, dictate the flow of the conversation, and win the verbal duel.