The dynamic capabilities framework analyzes the sources and methods of wealth creation and capture by private enterprise firms operating in environments of rapid technological change. The competitive advantage of firms is seen as resting on distinctive processes (ways of coordinating and combining), shaped by the firm's (specific) asset positions (such as the firm's portfolio of difftcult-to- trade knowledge assets and complementary assets), and the evolution path(s) it has aflopted or inherited. The importance of path dependencies is amplified where conditions of increasing retums exist. Whether and how a firm's competitive advantage is eroded depends on the stability of market demand, and the ease of replicability (expanding intemally) and imitatability (replication by competitors). If correct, the framework suggests that private wealth creation in regimes of rapid technological change depends in large measure on honing intemal technological, organizational, and managerial processes inside the firm. In short, identifying new opportunities and organizing effectively and efficiently to embrace them are generally more fundamental to private wealth creation than is strategizing, if by strategizing one means engaging in business conduct that keeps competitors off balance, raises rival's costs, and excludes new entrants. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

/pdf/dynamic-capabilities-and-strategic-management-4iyi34iyh6.pdf

Dynamic capabilities and strategic management

This paper focuses on dynamic capabilities and, more generally, the resource-based view of the firm. We argue that dynamic capabilities are a set of specific and identifiable processes such as product development, strategic decision making, and alliancing. They are neither vague nor tautological. Although dynamic capabilities are idiosyncratic in their details and path dependent in their emergence, they have significant commonalities across firms (popularly termed ‘best practice’). This suggests that they are more homogeneous, fungible, equifinal, and substitutable than is usually assumed. In moderately dynamic markets, dynamic capabilities resemble the traditional conception of routines. They are detailed, analytic, stable processes with predictable outcomes. In contrast, in high-velocity markets, they are simple, highly experiential and fragile processes with unpredictable outcomes. Finally, well-known learning mechanisms guide the evolution of dynamic capabilities. In moderately dynamic markets, the evolutionary emphasis is on variation. In high-velocity markets, it is on selection. At the level of RBV, we conclude that traditional RBV misidentifies the locus of long-term competitive advantage in dynamic markets, overemphasizes the strategic logic of leverage, and reaches a boundary condition in high-velocity markets. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

/pdf/dynamic-capabilities-what-are-they-3cn0mb9rpo.pdf

Dynamic capabilities, what are they?

Marketing inherited a model of exchange from economics, which had a dominant logic based on the exchange of “goods,” which usually are manufactured output The dominant logic focused on tangible resources, embedded value, and transactions Over the past several decades, new perspectives have emerged that have a revised logic focused on intangible resources, the cocreation of value, and relationships The authors believe that the new perspectives are converging to form a new dominant logic for marketing, one in which service provision rather than goods is fundamental to economic exchange The authors explore this evolving logic and the corresponding shift in perspective for marketing scholars, marketing practitioners, and marketing educators

/pdf/evolving-to-a-new-dominant-logic-for-marketing-bnlxqi06a2.pdf

Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing

Given assumptions about the characteristics of knowledge and the knowledge requirements of production, the firm is conceptualized as an institution for integrating knowledge. The primary contribution of the paper is in exploring the coordination mechanisms through which firms integrate the specialist knowledge of their members. In contrast to earlier literature, knowledge is viewed as residing within the individual, and the primary role of the organization is knowledge application rather than knowledge creation. The resulting theory has implications for the basis of organizational capability, the principles of organization design (in particular, the analysis of hierarchy and the distribution of decision-making authority), and the determinants of the horizontal and vertical boundaries of the firm. More generally, the knowledge-based approach sheds new light upon current organizational innovations and trends and has far-reaching implications for management practice.

https://memberfiles.freewebs.com/84/90/65819084/documents/TOWARD%20A%20KNOWLEDGE-BASED%20THEORY%20OF%20THE.pdf

Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm

In this article we offer a view that suggests that a firm's critical resources may span firm boundaries and may be embedded in interfirm resources and routines. We argue that an increasingly important unit of analysis for understanding competitive advantage is the relationship between firms and identify four potential sources of interorganizational competitive advantage: (1) relation-specific assets, (2) knowledge-sharing routines, (3) complementary resources/capabilities, and (4) effective governance. We examine each of these potential sources of rent in detail, identifying key subprocesses, and also discuss the isolating mechanisms that serve to preserve relational rents. Finally, we discuss how the relational view may offer normative prescriptions for firm-level strategies that contradict the prescriptions offered by those with a resource-based view or industry structure view.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/259056.pdf

The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage

This paper discusses some developments in the theory of the organizational capabilities of the business enterprise. Antecedents are recognized, and some promising new developments and areas for future research are identified. The role of managers in the economic system is highlighted and discussed within the context of economic and organizational research. Suggestions for future developments of dynamic capability research involve employment of evolutionary and behavioral theories.

Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance

Establishes a framework within which to analyze the profit distribution of innovations and determines the reasons why imitators may outperform innovators. First, the three fundamental building blocks necessary to explain the distribution of innovations are discussed: the appropriability regime, complementary assets, and the dominant design paradigm. Next, the imitation process and the distribution of profits between innovator and follower are examined by relating these three concepts. Then, an appropriate control structure is proposed which the innovator ought to establish over critical, complementary assets. Finally, implications for R&D strategy, industry structure and trade policies are discussed. Analysis suggests that firm boundaries are an important strategic variable for firms that innovate. Also, innovator ownership of complementary assets can be the deciding factor in whether innovators or imitators outperform one another in garnering the most economic return from innovation. (SFL)

Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy

From the Publisher:
"In this book David Teece considers how firms can exploit technological innovation, protecting their intellectual capital, while staying ahead of the competition. He provides frameworks as well as practical advice, looking in particular at the organization structures most likely to support innovation, and how managerial decisions and strategy affect the division of the gains." "This will be essential reading for academics, managers, and students alike who want to keep abreast of contemporary strategic challenges."--BOOK JACKET.

Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions

Champions of virtual corporations are urging managers to subcontract anything and everything All over the world, companies are jumping on the bandwagon, decentralizing, downsizing, and forging alliances to pursue innovation Why is the idea of the virtual organization so tantalizing? Because we have come to believe that bureaucracy is bad and flexibility is good And so it follows that a company that invests in as little as possible will be more responsive to a changing market-place and more likely to attain global competitive advantage

When is virtual virtuous?: organizing for innovation

This paper applies transactions cost principles to the multinational enterprise in order to ascertain its distinctive properties as a mode of economic organization. The analysis helps identify just when and where contractual alternatives to the multinational firm are likely to be viable. This turns out to depend upon the nature of the technology, the regime of appropriability within which the firm operates, and the characteristics of the markets in question. Transactions cost analysis is also extended to the multinational enterprise-host country relationship. Implications for management and public policy are derived.

David J. Teece

Papers

Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance

Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy

Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions

When is virtual virtuous?: organizing for innovation

TRANSACTIONS COST ECONOMICS AND THE MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE An Assessment