D
David S. Boninger
Researcher at University of California, Los Angeles
Publications - 13
Citations - 3388
David S. Boninger is an academic researcher from University of California, Los Angeles. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cognition & Counterfactual thinking. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 13 publications receiving 3147 citations. Previous affiliations of David S. Boninger include Ohio State University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior.
TL;DR: This paper proposed a new construct called consideration of future consequences (CFC), which is hypothesized to be a stable individual difference in the extent to which people consider distant versus immediate consequences of potential behaviors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?
TL;DR: In this article, a variety of attributes differentiate attitudes that are stable and conseguential from those that are not, including extremity, certainty, importance, knowledge, intensity, interest, direct experience, accessibility, latitudes of rejection and noncommitment, and affective-cognitive consistency.
Journal ArticleDOI
Origins of attitude importance: self-interest, social identification, and value relevance.
TL;DR: The authors examined the relation between attitude importance and three hypothesized determinants: self-interest, social identification with reference groups or reference individuals, and cherished values, and found that people's theories of the causes of attitude importance pointed to all three hypothesized predictors.
Journal ArticleDOI
All Cues Are Not Created Equal: Obtaining Attitude Persistence under Low-Involvement Conditions
TL;DR: This article found that when both related and unrelated peripheral cues evoke similar initial attitudes, only when the cue is related to the product category do attitudes persist over time, and the results of two studies attest to the robustness of the phenomenon and add to current models of attitude persistence.
Journal ArticleDOI
Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory.
TL;DR: It is tested that importance causes the accumulation of knowledge by inspiring selective exposure to and selective elaboration of relevant information, and people do not use perceptions of their knowledge volume to infer how important an attitude is to them, but importance does cause knowledge accumulation.