D
Dolores Albarracín
Researcher at University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
Publications - 181
Citations - 15372
Dolores Albarracín is an academic researcher from University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. The author has contributed to research in topics: Action (philosophy) & Behavior change. The author has an hindex of 44, co-authored 174 publications receiving 13310 citations. Previous affiliations of Dolores Albarracín include University of Pennsylvania & University of Illinois at Chicago.
Papers
More filters
The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior
TL;DR: The authors reviewed major meta-analyses of the attitude-behavior relation and found that general attitudes toward policies, people, institutions, and events correlate well with general behavioral patterns but not with specific behaviors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior as Models of Condom Use: A Meta-Analysis
TL;DR: Perceived behavioral control was related to condom use intentions and condom use, but in contrast to the theory, it did not contribute significantly to condom used, and implications for HIV prevention efforts are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation.
TL;DR: The findings indicated that attitudes correlated with a future behavior more strongly when they were easy to recall and stable over time and when participants had direct experience with the attitude object and reported their attitudes frequently.
Journal ArticleDOI
Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information.
William Hart,Dolores Albarracín,Alice H. Eagly,Inge Brechan,Matthew J. Lindberg,Lisa A. Merrill +5 more
TL;DR: A meta-analysis assessed whether exposure to information is guided by defense or accuracy motives, and found an uncongeniality bias emerged when uncongsenial information was relevant to accomplishing a current goal.
BookDOI
The Handbook of Attitudes
TL;DR: The authors presents, synthesizes, and integrates the existing knowledge of methods, theories, and data in attitudes in attitudes, and features an innovative chapter on implicit versus explicit attitudes with contributions from the top specialists, some who have never before worked together.