scispace - formally typeset
E

Elizabeth R. Brown

Researcher at University of North Florida

Publications -  23
Citations -  2449

Elizabeth R. Brown is an academic researcher from University of North Florida. The author has contributed to research in topics: Science education & Role congruity theory. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 21 publications receiving 1966 citations. Previous affiliations of Elizabeth R. Brown include Miami University & Montana State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles A New Look at Why Women Opt Out of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers

TL;DR: This paper found that women tend to endorse communal goals more than men, and that women are perceived as less likely than men to fulfill communal goals (e.g., working with or helping other people).
Journal ArticleDOI

Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: evidence for a goal congruity perspective.

TL;DR: The goal congruity perspective as discussed by the authors posits that two distinct social cognitions predict attraction to science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) fields: women's tendency to endorse communal goals more highly than do men, along with consensual stereotypes that STEM careers impede communal goals, intersect to produce disinterest in STEM careers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication

Charles R. Ebersole, +63 more
TL;DR: This paper examined time of semester variation in 10 known effects, 10 individual differences, and 3 data quality indicators over the course of the academic semester in 20 participant pools and with an online sample.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Goal Congruity Model of Role Entry, Engagement, and Exit: Understanding Communal Goal Processes in STEM Gender Gaps

TL;DR: The patterning of gender disparities in STEM that leads to a focus on communal goal congruity is reviewed, evidence for the foundational logic of the perspective is provided, and the implications for research and policy are explored.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder.

TL;DR: Men evaluate the gender-bias research less favorably than women, and this gender difference was especially prominent among STEM faculty (experiment 2).