scispace - formally typeset
E

Emmanuel J. Candès

Researcher at Stanford University

Publications -  280
Citations -  148481

Emmanuel J. Candès is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Convex optimization & Compressed sensing. The author has an hindex of 102, co-authored 262 publications receiving 135077 citations. Previous affiliations of Emmanuel J. Candès include Samsung & École Normale Supérieure.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings Article

A Differential Equation for Modeling Nesterov’s Accelerated Gradient Method: Theory and Insights

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors derive a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE), which is the limit of Nesterov's accelerated gradient method, which can serve as a tool for analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global testing under sparse alternatives: ANOVA, multiple comparisons and the higher criticism

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that under moderate sparsity levels, that is, 0 ≤ α ≤ 1/2, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) is essentially optimal under some conditions on the design.
Posted Content

Tight oracle bounds for low-rank matrix recovery from a minimal number of random measurements

TL;DR: It is shown that properly constrained nuclear-norm minimization stably recovers a low-rank matrix from a constant number of noisy measurements per degree of freedom; this seems to be the first result of this nature.
Book

New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with C² singularities

TL;DR: It is proved that curvelets provide an essentially optimal representation of typical objects f which are C except for discontinuities along C curves, which is nearly as sparse as if f were not singular and turn out to be far more sparse than the wavelet decomposition of the object.
Journal ArticleDOI

A modern maximum-likelihood theory for high-dimensional logistic regression

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) is biased, the variability of the MLE is far greater than classically estimated, and the likelihood-ratio test (LRT) is not distributed as a χ2 The bias of MLE yields wrong predictions for the probability of a case based on observed values of the covariates.