E
Erik von Elm
Researcher at University of Lausanne
Publications - 143
Citations - 44946
Erik von Elm is an academic researcher from University of Lausanne. The author has contributed to research in topics: Randomized controlled trial & Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology. The author has an hindex of 39, co-authored 134 publications receiving 34259 citations. Previous affiliations of Erik von Elm include University Medical Center Freiburg & University Hospital of Lausanne.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +5 more
TL;DR: In this article, a group of methodologists, researchers, and journal editors sets out guidelines to improve reports of observational studies, which hampers assessment and makes it less useful.
Journal ArticleDOI
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration
Jan P. Vandenbroucke,Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Peter C Gøtzsche,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Stuart J. Pocock,Charles Poole,James J. Schlesselman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger +9 more
TL;DR: The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers.
Journal ArticleDOI
[The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement].
Eric I Benchimol,Liam Smeeth,Astrid Guttmann,Katie Harron,David Moher,Irene Petersen,Henrik Toft Sørensen,Erik von Elm,Sinead Langan +8 more
TL;DR: This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of theRECORD checklist, and examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein.