The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TLDR
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.About:
This article is published in The Lancet.The article was published on 2007-10-20 and is currently open access. It has received 9603 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology & Observational study.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal Article
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement [in Spanish]
David Moher,Alessandro Liberati,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman,Gerd Antes,David C. Atkins,Virginia Barbour,N Barrowman,Jesse A. Berlin,J Clark,Mike Clarke,Deborah J. Cook,Roberto D'Amico,Jonathan J Deeks,Philip J. Devereaux,Kay Dickersin,M Egger,E Ernst,P C Gøtzsche,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,G Guyatt,Julian P T Higgins,Ioannidis Jpa.,Jos Kleijnen,Tom Lang,N Magrini,D McNamee,Lorenzo Moja,C Mulrow,M Napoli,Andrew D Oxman,B Pham,Drummond Rennie,Margaret Sampson,Kenneth F. Schulz,Paul G. Shekelle,David Tovey,Peter Tugwell +37 more
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +10 more
TL;DR: An Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement is presented and updated guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
TL;DR: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is introduced, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
TL;DR: The revised CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
Journal ArticleDOI
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
TL;DR: This report hopes this report will generate further thought about ways to improve the quality of reports of meta-analyses of RCTs and that interested readers, reviewers, researchers, and editors will use the QUOROM statement and generate ideas for its improvement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
TL;DR: The concept of study quality and the methods used to assess quality are discussed and the methodology for both the assessment of quality and its incorporation into systematic reviews and meta-analysis is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
TL;DR: This paper provides updated and extended guidance, based on the 2010 version of the CONSORT statement and the 2008consORT statement for the reporting of abstracts, on how to report the results of cluster randomised controlled trials.