Gram-negative bacteria characteristically are surrounded by an additional membrane layer, the outer membrane. Although outer membrane components often play important roles in the interaction of symbiotic or pathogenic bacteria with their host organisms, the major role of this membrane must usually be to serve as a permeability barrier to prevent the entry of noxious compounds and at the same time to allow the influx of nutrient molecules. This review summarizes the development in the field since our previous review (H. Nikaido and M. Vaara, Microbiol. Rev. 49:1-32, 1985) was published. With the discovery of protein channels, structural knowledge enables us to understand in molecular detail how porins, specific channels, TonB-linked receptors, and other proteins function. We are now beginning to see how the export of large proteins occurs across the outer membrane. With our knowledge of the lipopolysaccharide-phospholipid asymmetric bilayer of the outer membrane, we are finally beginning to understand how this bilayer can retard the entry of lipophilic compounds, owing to our increasing knowledge about the chemistry of lipopolysaccharide from diverse organisms and the way in which lipopolysaccharide structure is modified by environmental conditions.

Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited

Various gram-negative animal and plant pathogens use a novel, sec-independent protein secretion system as a basic virulence mechanism. It is becoming increasingly clear that these so-called type III secretion systems inject (translocate) proteins into the cytosol of eukaryotic cells, where the translocated proteins facilitate bacterial pathogenesis by specifically interfering with host cell signal transduction and other cellular processes. Accordingly, some type III secretion systems are activated by bacterial contact with host cell surfaces. Individual type III secretion systems direct the secretion and translocation of a variety of unrelated proteins, which account for species-specific pathogenesis phenotypes. In contrast to the secreted virulence factors, most of the 15 to 20 membrane-associated proteins which constitute the type III secretion apparatus are conserved among different pathogens. Most of the inner membrane components of the type III secretion apparatus show additional homologies to flagellar biosynthetic proteins, while a conserved outer membrane factor is similar to secretins from type II and other secretion pathways. Structurally conserved chaperones which specifically bind to individual secreted proteins play an important role in type III protein secretion, apparently by preventing premature interactions of the secreted factors with other proteins. The genes encoding type III secretion systems are clustered, and various pieces of evidence suggest that these systems have been acquired by horizontal genetic transfer during evolution. Expression of type III secretion systems is coordinately regulated in response to host environmental stimuli by networks of transcription factors. This review comprises a comparison of the structure, function, regulation, and impact on host cells of the type III secretion systems in the animal pathogens Yersinia spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella typhimurium, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, and Chlamydia spp. and the plant pathogens Pseudomonas syringae, Erwinia spp., Ralstonia solanacearum, Xanthomonas campestris, and Rhizobium spp.

/pdf/type-iii-protein-secretion-systems-in-bacterial-pathogens-of-4iowv8mqxc.pdf

Type III Protein Secretion Systems in Bacterial Pathogens of Animals and Plants

Comparative genomics demonstrated that the chromosomes from bacteria and their viruses (bacteriophages) are coevolving. This process is most evident for bacterial pathogens where the majority contain prophages or phage remnants integrated into the bacterial DNA. Many prophages from bacterial pathogens encode virulence factors. Two situations can be distinguished: Vibrio cholerae, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, and Clostridium botulinum depend on a specific prophage-encoded toxin for causing a specific disease, whereas Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium harbor a multitude of prophages and each phage-encoded virulence or fitness factor makes an incremental contribution to the fitness of the lysogen. These prophages behave like “swarms” of related prophages. Prophage diversification seems to be fueled by the frequent transfer of phage material by recombination with superinfecting phages, resident prophages, or occasional acquisition of other mobile DNA elements or bacterial chromosomal genes. Prophages also contribute to the diversification of the bacterial genome architecture. In many cases, they actually represent a large fraction of the strain-specific DNA sequences. In addition, they can serve as anchoring points for genome inversions. The current review presents the available genomics and biological data on prophages from bacterial pathogens in an evolutionary framework.

Phages and the Evolution of Bacterial Pathogens: from Genomic Rearrangements to Lysogenic Conversion

The type III secretion injectisome is a complex nanomachine that allows bacteria to deliver protein effectors across eukaryotic cellular membranes In recent years, significant progress has been made in our understanding of its structure, assembly and mode of operation The principal structural components of the injectisome, from the base located in the bacterial cytosol to the tip of the needle protruding from the cell surface, have been investigated in detail The structures of several constituent proteins were solved at the atomic level and important insights into the assembly process have been gained However, despite the ongoing concerted efforts of molecular and structural biologists, the role of many of the constituent components of this nanomachine remain unknown

The type III secretion injectisome.

Bordetella respiratory infections are common in people (B. pertussis) and in animals (B. bronchiseptica). During the last two decades, much has been learned about the virulence determinants, pathogenesis, and immunity of Bordetella. Clinically, the full spectrum of disease due to B. pertussis infection is now understood, and infections in adolescents and adults are recognized as the reservoir for cyclic outbreaks of disease. DTaP vaccines, which are less reactogenic than DTP vaccines, are now in general use in many developed countries, and it is expected that the expansion of their use to adolescents and adults will have a significant impact on reducing pertussis and perhaps decrease the circulation of B. pertussis. Future studies should seek to determine the cause of the unique cough which is associated with Bordetella respiratory infections. It is also hoped that data gathered from molecular Bordetella research will lead to a new generation of DTaP vaccines which provide greater efficacy than is provided by today's vaccines.

Molecular Pathogenesis, Epidemiology, and Clinical Manifestations of Respiratory Infections Due to Bordetella pertussis and Other Bordetella Subspecies

Type III secretion systems allow Yersinia spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Bordetella spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adhering at the surface of a eukaryotic cell to inject bacterial proteins across the two bacterial membranes and the eukaryotic cell membrane to destroy or subvert the target cell. These systems consist of a secretion apparatus, made of approximately 25 proteins, and an array of proteins released by this apparatus. Some of these released proteins are "effectors," which are delivered into the cytosol of the target cell, whereas the others are "translocators," which help the effectors to cross the membrane of the eukaryotic cell. Most of the effectors act on the cytoskeleton or on intracellular-signaling cascades. A protein injected by the enteropathogenic E. coli serves as a membrane receptor for the docking of the bacterium itself at the surface of the cell. Type III secretion systems also occur in plant pathogens where they are involved both in causing disease in susceptible hosts and in eliciting the so-called hypersensitive response in resistant or nonhost plants. They consist of 15-20 Hrp proteins building a secretion apparatus and two groups of effectors: harpins and avirulence proteins. Harpins are presumably secreted in the extracellular compartment, whereas avirulence proteins are thought to be targeted into plant cells. Although a coherent picture is clearly emerging, basic questions remain to be answered. In particular, little is known about how the type III apparatus fits together to deliver proteins in animal cells. It is even more mysterious for plant cells where a thick wall has to be crossed. In spite of these haunting questions, type III secretion appears as a fascinating trans-kingdom communication device.

Assembly and function of type iii secretory systems

This paper describes the identification of a new class of extracellular bacterial proteins, typified by PopA1 and its derivative PopA3, which act as specific hypersensitive response (HR) elicitors. These two heat-stable proteins, with HR-like elicitor activities on tobacco (non-host plant) but without activity on tomato (host plant), have been characterized from the supernatant of the plant pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas solanacearum strain GMI1000. These two proteins induced the same pattern of response on Petunia, as a function of the genotypes tested. popA, the structural gene for PopA1, maps outside of the hrp gene cluster but belongs to the hrp regulon. The amino acid sequence of PopA1 does not show homology to any characterized proteins. Its secretion is dependent on hrp genes and is followed by stepwise removal of the 93 amino-terminal amino acids, producing the protein PopA3. Petunia lines responsive to PopA3 and its precursors were resistant to infection by strain GMI1000, whereas non-responsive lines were sensitive, suggesting that popA could be an avirulence gene. A popA mutant remained fully pathogenic on sensitive plants, indicating that this gene is not essential for pathogenicity. While lacking PopA1, this mutant, which remained avirulent on tobacco and on resistant Petunia lines, still produced additional extracellular necrogenic compounds. On the basis of both their structural features and the biological properties of the popA mutant, PopA1 and PopA3 clearly differ from hairpins characterized in other plant pathogenic bacteria.

PopA1, a Protein Which Induces a Hypersensitivity-Like Response on Specific Petunia Genotypes, Is Secreted via the Hrp Pathway of Pseudomonas Solanacearum

Genes of plant-pathogenic bacteria controlling hypersensitive response (HR) elicitation and pathogenesis were designated ‘hrp’ by Lindgren et al. in 1986 (J Bacteriol 168: 512–522). hrp genes have been characterized in several species of the four major genera of Gramnegative plant pathogens, Erwinia, Pseudomonas, Ralstonia (a new proposed genus including Pseudomonas solanacearum) and Xanthomonas. To date, hrp genes have been found mainly in large clusters, and they have been shown to be conserved physically and, in many cases, functionally among different bacteria. Hybridization studies and genetic analyses have revealed the presence of functional hrp genes even in species that are not typically observed to elicit an HR, such as Erwinia chrysanthemi and Erwinia stewartii, suggesting that hrp genes may be common to all Gram-negative plant pathogens, possibly excluding Agrobacterium spp. Current knowledge of hrp genes has been reviewed by Bonas (1994, Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 192: 79–98) and by Van Gijsegem et al. (1995, In Pathogenesis and Host–Parasite Specificity in Plant Diseases: Histopathological, Biochemical, Genetic and Molecular Basis. Volume 1. (Kohmoto et al., eds); Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 273–292). The nucleotide sequences of four hrp gene clusters, those of Ralstonia solanacearum (previously P. solanacearum) (Genin et al., 1992, Mol Microbiol 6: 3065–3076; Gough et al., 1992, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 5: 384–389; Gough et al., 1993, Mol Gen Genet 239: 378–392; Van Gijsegem et al., 1995, Mol Microbiol 15: 1095–1114), Erwinia amylovora (Bogdanove et al., 1996, J Bacteriol 178: 1720– 1730; Wei and Beer, 1993, J Bacteriol 175: 7958–7967; Wei and Beer, 1995, J Bacteriol 177: 6201–6210; Wei et al., 1992, Science 257: 85–88; S. V. Beer, unpublished), Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (Huang et al., 1992, J Bacteriol 174: 6878–6885; Huang et al., 1993, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 6: 515–520; Huang et al., 1995, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 8: 733–746; Lidell and Hutcheson, 1994, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 7: 488–497; Preston et al., 1995, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 8: 717–732; Xiao et al., 1994, J Bacteriol 176: 1025–1036), and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Fenselau et al., 1992, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 5: 390–396; Fenselau and Bonas, 1995, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 8: 845–854; U. Bonas, unpublished), have been largely determined. These clusters each contain more than twenty genes, many of which encode components of a novel proteinsecretion pathway designated ‘type III’. It has been shown directly that various extracellular proteins involved in pathogenesis and defence elicitation by plantpathogenic bacteria utilize this pathway (Arlat et al., 1994, EMBO J 13: 543–553; He et al., 1993, Cell 73: 1255–1266; Wei and Beer, 1993, ibid.), and the pathway is known to function in the export of virulence factors from the animal pathogens Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Yersinia entercolitica, Yersinia pestis, and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (for reviews, see Salmond and Reeves, 1993, Trends Biochem Sci 18: 7–12; and Van Gijsegem et al., 1993, Trends Microbiol 1: 175– 180). Nine type III secretion genes are conserved among all four of the plant pathogens listed above and among the animal pathogens. Based on sequence analysis and some experimental evidence, they are believed to encode one outer-membrane protein, one outer-membrane-associated lipoprotein, five inner-membrane proteins, and two cytoplasmic proteins, one of which is a putative ATPase. All of the predicted gene products, except the outer-membrane protein, show significant similarity to components of the flagellar biogenesis complex (for reviews see Blair, 1995, Annu Rev Microbiol 49: 489–522; and Bischoff and Ordal, 1992, Mol Microbiol 6: 23–28). We herein refer to the hrp-encoded type III pathway as the ‘Hrp pathway’. Because hrp genes have been characterized independently in diverse plant-pathogenic bacteria, hrp gene nomenclature differs in different species, and it is not always consistent even within the same organism. Different designations are used for homologous genes, and, even worse, the same designation is used for different genes in different organisms. For example, hrpI of E. amylovora is homologous with hrpC2 of X. campestris pv. vesicatoria and hrpO of R. solanacearum, and the homologue in P. syringae pv. syringae appears in the literature both as hrpI and as hrpJ2. Also, ‘hrpN ’ in R. solanacearum designates a secretion-pathway gene, whereas in E. amylovora, ‘hrpN ’ designates the gene encoding the elicitor harpin. Furthermore, in many bacteria the number of known hrp genes approaches 26. In anticipation of exhausting the alphabet, some authors chose to designate hrp genes with a letter and a number, creating the potential for confusion of distinct genes with alleles of the same gene. For hrp gene researchers, the current nomenclature is at best inconvenient; for other scientists, it is bewildering. Another problem exists: accumulation of knowledge about the structure of hrp loci has outpaced the accumulation of Molecular Microbiology (1996) 20(3), 681–683

Unified nomenclature for broadly conserved hrp genes of phytopathogenic bacteria

A pLAFR3 cosmid clone designated pVir2 containing a 25-kilobase (kb) DNA insert was isolated from a wild-type Pseudomonas solanacearum GMI1000 genomic library. This cosmid was shown to complement all but one of the nine Tn5-induced mutants which have been isolated after random mutagenesis and which have lost both pathogenicity toward tomato and ability to induce hypersensitive reaction (HR) on tobacco (hrp mutants). The insert is colinear with the genome and provides restoration of the HR-inducing ability when transferred into several Tn5-induced hrp mutants, but failed to complement deletion mutants extending on both sides of the pVir2 region. Localized mutagenesis demonstrated that the hrp genes are clustered within a 17.5-kb region of pVir2 and that this cluster probably extends on the genomic region adjacent to the pVir2 insert. A 3-kb region adjacent to the hrp cluster modulates aggressiveness toward tomato but does not control HR-inducing ability. Sequences within the hrp cluster of pVir2 have homology with the genomic DNA of Xanthomonas campestris strains representing eight different pathovars, suggesting that a set of common pathogenicity functions could be shared by P. solanacearum and X. campestris.

Pseudomonas solanacearum genes controlling both pathogenicity on tomato and hypersensitivity on tobacco are clustered.

PopA1, a protein which induces a hypersensitive-like response on specific Petunia genotypes, is secreted via the Hrp pathway of Pseudomonas solanacearum. The EMBO Journal, 13, 543-553

F. Van Gijsegem

Papers

Assembly and function of type iii secretory systems

PopA1, a Protein Which Induces a Hypersensitivity-Like Response on Specific Petunia Genotypes, Is Secreted via the Hrp Pathway of Pseudomonas Solanacearum

Unified nomenclature for broadly conserved hrp genes of phytopathogenic bacteria

Pseudomonas solanacearum genes controlling both pathogenicity on tomato and hypersensitivity on tobacco are clustered.

PopA1, a protein which induces a hypersensitive-like response on specific Petunia genotypes, is secreted via the Hrp pathway of Pseudomonas solanacearum. The EMBO Journal, 13, 543-553