scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Hermann Wagner published in 2014"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The detection step is treated separately from remodeling, and why a similar representation of ITD across species may exist in the forebrain despite differences in detection and representation in the midbrain is explained.

41 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
20 Mar 2014-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: A statistical analysis was used to evaluate the regionalization of the cervical spine in the barn owl and suggested 3–7 regions that allow a high degree of flexibility, potentially facilitating the large head turns that barn owls are able to make.
Abstract: Background Owls possess an extraordinary neck and head mobility. To understand this mobility it is necessary to have an anatomical description of cervical vertebrae with an emphasis on those criteria that are relevant for head positioning. No functional description specific to owls is available. Methodology/Principal findings X-ray films and micro-CT scans were recorded from American barn owls (Tyto furcata pratincola) and used to obtain three-dimensional head movements and three-dimensional models of the 14 cervical vertebrae (C1−C14). The diameter of the vertebral canal, the zygapophyseal protrusion, the distance between joint centers, and the pitching angle were quantified. Whereas the first two variables are purely osteological characteristics of single vertebrae, the latter two take into account interactions between vertebrae. These variables change in characteristic ways from cranial to caudal. The vertebral canal is wide in the cranial and caudal neck regions, but narrow in the middle, where both the zygapophyseal protrusion and the distance between joint centers are large. Pitching angles are more negative in the cranial and caudal neck regions than in the middle region. Cluster analysis suggested a complex regionalization. Whereas the borders (C1 and C13/C14) formed stable clusters, the other cervical vertebrae were sorted into 4 or 5 additional clusters. The borders of the clusters were influenced by the variables analyzed. Conclusions/Significance A statistical analysis was used to evaluate the regionalization of the cervical spine in the barn owl. While earlier measurements have shown that there appear to be three regions of flexibility of the neck, our indicators suggest 3–7 regions. These many regions allow a high degree of flexibility, potentially facilitating the large head turns that barn owls are able to make. The cervical vertebral series of other species should also be investigated using statistical criteria to further characterize morphology and the potential movements associated with it.

38 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The geometry of the input axons and their corresponding conduction velocities and latencies are modeled to understand the problem in birds and have relevance not only for auditory processing but also for other computational tasks that require adaptive regulation of conduction velocity.
Abstract: Inputs from the two sides of the brain interact to create maps of interaural time difference (ITD) in the nucleus laminaris of birds. How inputs from each side are matched with high temporal precision in ITD-sensitive circuits is unknown, given the differences in input path lengths from each side. To understand this problem in birds, we modeled the geometry of the input axons and their corresponding conduction velocities and latencies. Consistent with existing physiological data, we assumed a common latency up to the border of nucleus laminaris. We analyzed two biological implementations of the model, the single ITD map in chickens and the multiple maps of ITD in barn owls. For binaural inputs, since ipsi- and contralateral initial common latencies were very similar, we could restrict adaptive regulation of conduction velocity to within the nucleus. Other model applications include the simultaneous derivation of multiple conduction velocities from one set of measurements and the demonstration that contours with the same ITD cannot be parallel to the border of nucleus laminaris in the owl. Physiological tests of the predictions of the model demonstrate its validity and robustness. This model may have relevance not only for auditory processing but also for other computational tasks that require adaptive regulation of conduction velocity.

13 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that waiting for a second stimulus may indeed impose costs on sound localization by adaptation and this reduces the gain obtained by waiting forA second stimulus.
Abstract: Barn owls do not immediately approach a source after they hear a sound, but wait for a second sound before they strike. This represents a gain in striking behavior by avoiding responses to random incidents. However, the first stimulus is also expected to change the threshold for perceiving the subsequent second sound, thus possibly introducing some costs. We mimicked this situation in a behavioral double-stimulus paradigm utilizing saccadic head turns of owls. The first stimulus served as an adapter, was presented in frontal space, and did not elicit a head turn. The second stimulus, emitted from a peripheral source, elicited the head turn. The time interval between both stimuli was varied. Data obtained with double stimulation were compared with data collected with a single stimulus from the same positions as the second stimulus in the double-stimulus paradigm. Sound-localization performance was quantified by the response latency, accuracy, and precision of the head turns. Response latency was increased with double stimuli, while accuracy and precision were decreased. The effect depended on the inter-stimulus interval. These results suggest that waiting for a second stimulus may indeed impose costs on sound localization by adaptation and this reduces the gain obtained by waiting for a second stimulus.

7 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A Jeffress-based sound localization model is presented, and it is shown that side peak suppression did not only depend on bandwidth, but also on the center frequency and the distance of the side peak to the main response peak, with a proportionality factor depending on relative bandwidth.
Abstract: Multiplication-like sound localization models are subjected to phase ambiguities for high-frequency tonal stimuli as multiplication creates several equivalent response peaks in tuning curves. By increasing the bandwidth of the stimulus, phase ambiguities can be reduced, which is often referred to as side peak suppression. In this study we present a Jeffress-based sound localization model, and determine side peak suppression analytically. The results were verified with an implementation of the same model, and compared to physiological data of barn owls. Three types of stimuli were analyzed: pure-tone stimuli, two-tone complexes with varying frequency distances, and noise signals with variable bandwidths. As an additional parameter we also determined the half-width of the main response peak to examine the scaling of tuning curves in azimuth. Results showed that side peak suppression did not only depend on bandwidth, but also on the center frequency and the distance of the side peak to the main response peak. In particular, the analytical model predicted that side peak suppression is a function of relative bandwidth, whereas half-width is inversely proportional to center frequency, with a proportionality factor depending on relative bandwidth. The analytical approach and the implementation yielded equivalent tuning curves (deviation < 1 %). Moreover, the electrophysiological data recorded in barn owls closely matched the predicted tuning curves.

3 citations