scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Ian D. Pavord published in 2023"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors presented the results of a study at the National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI) at the University of Exeter in South Africa, where the authors used IDIBAPS and CIBERES to evaluate the performance of a lung cancer patient.
Abstract: University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS and CIBERES, Spain Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA University of Exeter Medical School College of Medicine and Health University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK South Texas Veterans Health Care System University of Texas, Health San Antonio, Texas, USA National Heart & Lung Institute Imperial College London, UK McGill University Health Centre McGill University Montreal, Canada University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Weill Cornell Medical Center/ New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, USA Hospital Universitario de Caracas Universidad Central de Venezuela Centro Médico de Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK / National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK / School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa

14 citations




Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors used data from the REDES study to assess the proportion of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma achieving their multicomponent definitions of clinical remission after 1 year of mepolizumab treatment.
Abstract: Introduction Clinical remission as a multicomponent treatment goal in severe asthma is being explored in clinical practice. This post hoc analysis used data from the REDES study to assess the proportion of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma achieving our multicomponent definitions of clinical remission after 1 year of mepolizumab treatment. Methods The real-world, retrospective observational REDES study enrolled patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were newly prescribed mepolizumab and with ≥12 months of medical records pre-enrolment. Multicomponent clinical remission was defined as: oral corticosteroid (OCS)-free; exacerbation-free; asthma control test (ACT) score ≥20; and with or without post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≥80%. Baseline characteristics were also assessed in those who did/did not achieve clinical remission. Results 37% and 30% of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma met our proposed three- and four-component on-treatment clinical remission definitions; an increase from 2% and 3% at baseline. Most frequently achieved individual components of clinical remission were: OCS-free; ACT score ≥20. For patients fulfilling the multicomponent clinical remission definitions, at baseline we observed higher blood eosinophil counts, better ACT scores and lung function, lower maintenance OCS use, and a slightly lower rate of prior exacerbations versus those who did not. Discussion Clinical remission is a realistic target in clinical practice for a subset of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving mepolizumab. Further studies are required to elucidate whether features linked to the underlying endotype can help predict treatment outcomes, increase rates of clinical remission, and potentially modify disease progression.

4 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors proposed a short patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument called the chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT) to assess overall health status across different obstructive lung diseases.
Abstract: Abstract Background No short patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments assess overall health status across different obstructive lung diseases. Thus, the wording of the introduction to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) was modified to permit use in asthma and/or COPD. This tool is called the Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT). Methods The psychometric properties of the CAAT were evaluated using baseline data from the NOVELTY study (NCT02760329) in patients with physician-assigned asthma, asthma + COPD or COPD. Analyses included exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses, differential item functioning and analysis of construct validity. Responses to the CAAT and CAT were compared in patients with asthma + COPD and those with COPD. Results CAAT items were internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha: > 0.7) within each diagnostic group (n = 510). Models for structural and measurement invariance were strong. Tests of differential item functioning showed small differences between asthma and COPD in individual items, but these were not consistent in direction and had minimal overall impact on the total score. The CAAT and CAT were highly consistent when assessed in all NOVELTY patients who completed both (N = 277, Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.90). Like the CAT itself, CAAT scores correlated moderately (0.4–0.7) to strongly (> 0.7) with other PRO measures and weakly (< 0.4) with spirometry measures. Conclusions CAAT scores appear to reflect the same health impairment across asthma and COPD, making the CAAT an appropriate PRO instrument for patients with asthma and/or COPD. Its brevity makes it suitable for use in clinical studies and routine clinical practice. Trial registration : NCT02760329.

2 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
19 Apr 2023-Allergy
TL;DR: In this article , dupilumab was shown to reduce severe asthma exacerbation rates and changes from parent study baseline (PSBL) in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and 5-item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) score in patients with moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma with and without evidence of allergic asthma at PSBL.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Previous research has shown greater efficacy of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled asthma and type 2 inflammation. We analyzed dupilumab's efficacy in patients from TRAVERSE study with or without evidence of allergic asthma and type 2 inflammation per current GINA guidelines (≥150 eosinophils/μL or FeNO ≥20 ppb). METHODS All patients aged ≥12 years who rolled over from the placebo-controlled QUEST study (NCT02414854) to TRAVERSE (NCT02134028) received add-on dupilumab 300mg every two weeks for up to 96 weeks. We assessed annualized severe asthma exacerbation rates (AERs) and changes from parent study baseline (PSBL) in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and 5-item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) score in patients with moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma with and without evidence of allergic asthma at PSBL. RESULTS In TRAVERSE, dupilumab consistently reduced AER across all subgroups. By Week 96, dupilumab increased pre-bronchodilator FEV1 from PSBL by 0.35-0.41L in patients receiving placebo during QUEST (placebo/dupilumab) and 0.34-0.44L in those receiving dupilumab during QUEST (dupilumab/dupilumab) with an allergic phenotype at baseline. In patients without evidence of allergic asthma, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 improved by 0.38-0.41L and 0.33-0.37L, respectively. By Week 48, ACQ-5 scores decreased from PSBL by 1.63-1.69 (placebo/dupilumab) and 1.74-1.81 (dupilumab/dupilumab) points across subgroups with allergic asthma, and 1.75-1.83 (placebo/dupilumab) and 1.78-1.86 (dupilumab/dupilumab) in those without. CONCLUSIONS Long-term treatment with dupilumab reduced exacerbation rates, and improved lung function and asthma control in patients with asthma with type 2 inflammation as per current GINA guidance and irrespective of evidence of allergic asthma.

1 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Scientific Committee performed a comprehensive review on this topic, qualitatively synthesised the evidence to date and proffered recommendations to mitigate the risk as discussed by the authors .
Abstract: Exposure to air pollution is a major contributor to the pathogenesis of COPD worldwide. Indeed, most recent estimates suggest that 50% of the total attributable risk of COPD may be related to air pollution. In response, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Scientific Committee performed a comprehensive review on this topic, qualitatively synthesised the evidence to date and proffered recommendations to mitigate the risk. The review found that both gaseous and particulate components of air pollution are likely contributors to COPD. There are no absolutely safe levels of ambient air pollution and the relationship between air pollution levels and respiratory events is supra-linear. Wildfires and extreme weather events such as heat waves, which are becoming more common owing to climate change, are major threats to COPD patients and acutely increase their risk of morbidity and mortality. Exposure to air pollution also impairs lung growth in children and as such may lead to developmental COPD. GOLD recommends strong public health policies around the world to reduce ambient air pollution and for implementation of public warning systems and advisories, including where possible the use of personalised apps, to alert patients when ambient air pollution levels exceed acceptable minimal thresholds. When household particulate content exceeds acceptable thresholds, patients should consider using air cleaners and filters where feasible. Air pollution is a major health threat to patients living with COPD and actions are urgently required to reduce the morbidity and mortality related to poor air quality around the world. Air pollution is a major global threat to patients with COPD. Strong public health policies to reduce air pollution levels along with targeted mitigation strategies are urgently needed. https://bit.ly/3L3dN7e

1 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a biomarker-stratified analysis of asthma attack occurrence according to the baseline blood eosinophil count was conducted in 1,074 toddlers (12- to 71-montholds) with recurrent wheezing.

1 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
11 Jul 2023-Allergy
TL;DR: In this paper , dupilumab showed sustained efficacy for up to 3 years in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma on high- or medium-dose ICS.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Dupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukins-4/13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. The TRAVERSE (NCT02134028) open-label extension study demonstrated the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients ≥12 years who completed a previous dupilumab asthma study. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in the parent studies. Here, we assess whether dupilumab sustains long-term efficacy in patients regardless of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose at parent study baseline (PSBL). METHODS Patients from phase 2b (NCT01854047) or phase 3 (QUEST; NCT02414854) studies receiving high- or medium-dose ICS at PSBL and enrolled in TRAVERSE were included. We analyzed unadjusted annualized severe exacerbation rates, change from PSBL in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ), 5-item asthma control questionnaire, and type 2 biomarkers in patients with type 2 asthma at baseline (blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/μL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO] ≥25 ppb), and subgroups defined by baseline blood eosinophils or FeNO. RESULTS Of patients with type 2 asthma (n = 1666), 891 (53.5%) were receiving high-dose ICS at PSBL. In this subgroup, unadjusted exacerbation rates for dupilumab versus placebo were 0.517 versus 1.883 (phase 2b) and 0.571 versus 1.300 (QUEST) over the parent study (52 weeks) and remained low throughout TRAVERSE (0.313-0.494). Improvements in pre-BD FEV1 were sustained throughout TRAVERSE. Similar clinical efficacy was observed among patients receiving medium-dose ICS at PSBL and biomarker subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Dupilumab showed sustained efficacy for up to 3 years in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma on high- or medium-dose ICS.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors present a patient charter to describe the key elements of good quality care for people with EADs and present an action plan to improve health and overall well-being.
Abstract: WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT? Eosinophil-associated diseases (EADs) are a group of conditions in which eosinophils (a type of white blood cell) are thought to play a key role in the disease and how it develops. Some EADs are common, such as atopic dermatitis (also called eczema) and a subtype of asthma called eosinophilic asthma, while others are rare, such as hypereosinophilic syndrome (a condition in which a person has a very high number of eosinophils in both the blood and one or more organs). People with EADs face many problems related to their conditions. Symptoms such as severe abdominal pain, itch, or shortness of breath impact both the patient as well as their friends and family. Patients with EADs also experience delays to diagnosis and treatment as well as financial barriers. Healthcare professionals sometimes fail to recognize the complex set of symptoms that characterize an EAD, and this may cause delays in reaching a correct diagnosis. As a result, it may take longer for a patient to get the best care and the most effective treatments, which may contribute to poor health. The goal of this charter is to describe the key elements of good quality care, which all people with EADs deserve, as well as to present an action plan to improve health and overall well-being for people with EADs. Proposed use of this patient charter: The principles described in this charter (a written guide to achieve an outcome) show the core elements of quality care that people with EADs must receive. They also describe clear steps to reduce the burden on patients and their caregivers and to improve patient health outcomes. We urge healthcare professionals, hospitals, and policymakers around the world to adopt these principles quickly. By doing this, people with EADs will be more likely to receive an accurate and timely diagnosis and have access to quality care and treatment in the right setting.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a post-hoc analysis of patients atteints d’asthme sévère à éosinophiles traités by le mépolizumab dans 24 centres hospitaliers spécialisés dans l’Asthme en Espagne.


Peer ReviewDOI
TL;DR: Weinberger et al. as mentioned in this paper evaluated the efficacy and safety of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough (COUGH-1 and COUGH-2).
Abstract: 1. Gibson PG. Management of cough. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019;7: 1724–1729. 2. Birring SS, Dicpinigaitis PV, Smith JA, Morice AH, McGarvey LP, Pavord ID, et al. Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for refractory or unexplained chronic cough over 52 weeks. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023;207:1539–1542. 3. McGarvey LP, Birring SS, Morice AH, Dicpinigaitis PV, Pavord ID, Schelfhout J, et al.; COUGH-1 and COUGH-2 Investigators. Efficacy and safety of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough (COUGH-1 and COUGH-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet 2022;399:909–923. 4. Weinberger M, Buettner D, Anbar RD. A review, update, and commentary for the cough without a cause: facts and factoids of the habit cough. J Clin Med 2023;12:1970. 5. Weinberger M, Buettner D. Habit cough is a cause of chronic cough in adults. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol [online ahead of print] 25 Mar 2023; DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.03.018. 6. Wikipedia. Ted Kaptchuk. [accessed 2023 Apr 23]. Available from: https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaptchuk.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors discuss the key features of type 2 inflammation in asthma, summarize the clinical trial evidence of monoclonal antibody asthma treatments, and explore future avenues for targeted asthma treatment.
Abstract: In this Review, we discuss the key features of type 2 inflammation in asthma, summarize the clinical trial evidence of monoclonal antibody asthma treatments, and explore future avenues for targeted asthma treatment.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The open-label extension TRAVERSE study (NCT02134028) as mentioned in this paper assessed dupilumab long-term safety and efficacy in patients who completed Phase 2/3 dupilumaab asthma studies.
Abstract: Abstract Objective The open-label extension TRAVERSE study (NCT02134028) assessed dupilumab long-term safety and efficacy in patients who completed Phase 2/3 dupilumab asthma studies. This post hoc analysis evaluated long-term efficacy in type 2 patients with and without evidence of allergic asthma who enrolled in TRAVERSE from Phase 3 QUEST (NCT02414854) and Phase 2b (NCT01854047) studies. Non–type 2 patients with evidence of allergic asthma were also assessed. Methods Unadjusted annualized exacerbation rates during parent study and TRAVERSE treatment period, and changes from parent study baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and in 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores were assessed in patients from QUEST and Phase 2b; change from parent study baseline in total IgE level was assessed in patients enrolled from Phase 2b. Results 2062 patients from Phase 2b and QUEST enrolled in TRAVERSE. Of these, 969 were type 2 with evidence of allergic asthma; 710 were type 2 without evidence of allergic asthma; and 194 were non–type 2 with evidence of allergic asthma at parent study baseline. In these populations, reductions in exacerbation rates observed during parent studies were sustained during TRAVERSE. Type 2 patients who switched from placebo arm to dupilumab in TRAVERSE experienced similar reductions in severe exacerbation rates, and improvements in lung function and asthma control to those patients who already received dupilumab during the parent study. Conclusion Dupilumab efficacy was sustained for up to 3 years in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 inflammatory asthma, with or without evidence of allergic asthma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02134028

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , a single-center, prospective observational study was conducted to compare the clinical recovery between high and low-FeNO attacks after acute treatment with oral prednisolone among people established on long-term asthma mAb treatment.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Asthma attacks are a common and important problem. Someone experiences an asthma attack in the United Kingdom every 10 seconds. Asthma attacks cause coughing, wheezing, breathlessness, and chest tightness and are highly stressful for patients. They result in reduced quality of life, with days lost from work or school. Asthma attacks are treated with oral corticosteroids (OCSs), but these have many short- and long-term side effects. Asthma monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized the treatment of severe asthma by reducing asthma attacks and OCS burden by over 50%, but some people still experience attacks while on mAbs. The MEX study showed that residual asthma attacks are broadly eosinophilic (high fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO]) or noneosinophilic (low FeNO), but it did not measure response to OCS treatment. There is an evidence gap in understanding the clinical and inflammatory responses that occur when using OCSs to treat residual asthma attacks in patients taking asthma mAbs. OBJECTIVE The primary objective is to compare the clinical recovery between high-FeNO and low-FeNO attacks after acute treatment with oral prednisolone among people established on long-term asthma mAb treatment. The exploratory objective is to compare the inflammatory response to acute treatment with oral prednisolone between high-FeNO and low-FeNO attacks. METHODS BOOST (Breakthrough Asthma Attacks Treated With Oral Steroids) is a single-center, prospective observational study of 60 adults established on long-term asthma mAb treatment who receive acute treatment with oral prednisolone (usual care) for an asthma attack. The primary outcome will be the proportion of treatment failure (the need to start oral prednisolone or antibiotics or an unscheduled health care visit for asthma, following an attack) at day 28. The secondary outcomes will be the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and the change in visual analogue scale symptom score between the stable state, attack, day 7, and day 28 visits. The exploratory outcomes include the changes in sputum, nasal, and blood inflammometry between the stable state, attack, day 7, and day 28 visits. RESULTS The last asthma attack visit is anticipated to occur in December 2023. Data analysis and publication will take place in 2024. CONCLUSIONS We will test the hypothesis that there is a difference in the rate of recovery of clinical and inflammatory measures between high-FeNO and low-FeNO asthma attacks that occur in patients on mAb therapy. The study data will help power a future randomized placebo-controlled trial of prednisolone treatment for nonsevere attacks in patients treated with asthma mAbs and will provide important information on whether corticosteroid treatment should be FeNO-directed. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/46741.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors analyzed the whole blood transcriptome from 738 patients in Type-2 cytokine-low severe asthma patients to relate transcriptomic signatures to T2-biomarkers and asthma symptom scores.
Abstract: Background Patients with Type-2 (T2) cytokine-low severe asthma often have persistent symptoms despite suppression of T2-inflammation with corticosteroids (CS). Objectives To analyze whole blood transcriptome from 738 samples in T2-biomarker high/low severe asthma patients to relate transcriptomic signatures to T2-biomarkers and asthma symptom scores. Methods Bulk RNAseq data were generated for blood samples (baseline, Week24, Week48) from 301 participants recruited to a randomized clinical trial of CS optimization in severe asthma. Unsupervised clustering, differential gene expression analysis, and pathway analysis were performed. Patients were grouped by T2-biomarker status and symptoms. Associations between clinical characteristics and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with biomarker and symptom levels were investigated. Results Unsupervised clustering identified two clusters; Cluster 2 patients were blood eosinophil low/symptom high and more likely to be receiving oral CS (OCS). Differential gene expression analysis of these clusters, with and without stratification for OCS, identified 2,960 and 4,162 DEGs respectively. 627/2,960 genes remained after adjusting for OCS by subtracting OCS signature genes. Pathway analysis identified dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide biosynthesis and assembly of RNA polymerase I complex as significantly enriched pathways. No stable DEGs were associated with high symptoms in T2-biomarker low patients, but numerous associated with elevated T2-biomarkers, including 15 that were up-regulated at all time-points irrespective of symptom level. Conclusions OCS have a considerable effect on whole blood transcriptome. DEG analysis demonstrates a clear T2-biomarker transcriptomic signature, but no signature was found in association with T2-biomarker low patients, including those with a high symptom burden.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors presented worldwide, cross-sectional data on asthma control and asthma treatments in three age groups: children (aged 6-7 years), adolescents (13-14 years), and adults (≥19 years).

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Dupilumab as mentioned in this paper is a monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and -13, demonstrated efficacy in adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
Abstract: Purpose Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a predominantly type 2 inflammatory disease frequently coexisting with other type 2 conditions including asthma and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD). Coexisting asthma leads to increased CRSwNP symptom burden. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and -13, demonstrated efficacy in adults with severe CRSwNP in the Phase 3 SINUS-24 (NCT02912468) and SINUS-52 (NCT02898454) studies, including in patients with coexisting asthma/NSAID-ERD. However, the impact of different asthma characteristics on dupilumab treatment in this population is unknown. We report CRSwNP and asthma outcomes with dupilumab in patients with CRSwNP and coexisting asthma according to baseline asthma characteristics. Methods Change from baseline at Week 24 (pooled studies) and Week 52 (SINUS-52) in CRSwNP outcomes (nasal polyp score, nasal congestion, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT-22], loss of smell score, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test) and asthma outcomes (5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ-5], pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) were analyzed post hoc for placebo and dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks according to baseline blood eosinophils ≥150/≥300 cells/µL, ACQ-5 scores <1.5/≥1.5, and FEV1 <80%. Results In the pooled studies, 428/724 patients (59.1%) had coexisting asthma, of which 181/428 (42.3%) had coexisting NSAID-ERD. Dupilumab significantly improved all CRSwNP and asthma outcomes vs placebo at Week 24 (P < 0.001) regardless of baseline eosinophil or ACQ-5 category, or FEV1 <80%. Similar magnitude of improvement was seen at Week 52 (SINUS-52) and in patients with NSAID-ERD (pooled studies, Week 24). By Week 24, improvements with dupilumab exceeded the minimum clinically important differences for ACQ-5 and SNOT-22 in 35.2% to 74.2% and 72.0% to 78.7% of patients, respectively. Conclusion Dupilumab improved CRSwNP outcomes in patients with CRSwNP and coexisting asthma, and improved asthma outcomes, regardless of differences in baseline asthma characteristics.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The field of asthma has undergone a dramatic change in recent years and advances in our understanding of type 2 airway inflammation have driven the discovery of monoclonal antibodies targeting specific aspects of the immune pathway as mentioned in this paper .
Abstract: The field of asthma has undergone a dramatic change in recent years. Advances in our understanding of type 2 airway inflammation have driven the discovery of monoclonal antibodies targeting specific aspects of the immune pathway. In landmark trials, these drugs have shown efficacy in reducing asthma attacks and exposure to oral corticosteroids, important causes of morbidity in people with asthma. Our review explores the key features of type 2 inflammation in asthma and summarizes the clinical trial evidence of the novel monoclonal antibody treatments and future avenues for treatment.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors evaluated the effect of tezepelumab on seasonal asthma exacerbations in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, across all seasons and found that the effect was minimal.
Abstract: Exposure to seasonal allergens may contribute to spatiotemporal variations in asthma exacerbations. In the phase 3 NAVIGATOR study (NCT03347279), tezepelumab, reduced the annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) versus placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, across all seasons. This post hoc analysis evaluated the effect of tezepelumab on seasonal asthma exacerbations.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a modèle de régression multivariée a été réalisée sur la population en intention de traiter de l’étude QUEST, afin dévaluer les biomarqueurs and les caractéristiques cliniques associés à un déclin de la fonction respiratoire.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a time-to-event model was developed using pooled patient data (N=16,232) from 9 clinical studies to assess the relationship between baseline characteristics and exacerbation risk during regular dosing with ICS monotherapy or ICS/LABA combination therapy in clinical trial patients with varying levels of symptom control.
Abstract: AIMS There is limited understanding of how clinical and demographic characteristics are associated with exacerbation risk in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, and how these factors correlate with symptom control and treatment response. Here we assess the relationship between baseline characteristics and exacerbation risk during regular dosing with ICS monotherapy or ICS/LABA combination therapy in clinical trial patients with varying levels of symptom control, as assessed by the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5). METHODS A time-to-event model was developed using pooled patient data (N=16,232) from 9 clinical studies. A parametric hazard function was used to describe the time-to-first exacerbation. Covariate evaluation included seasonal variation, clinical and demographic baseline characteristics on baseline hazard. Predictive performance was evaluated by standard graphical and statistical methods. RESULTS An exponential hazard model best described the time-to-first exacerbation in moderate-to-severe asthma patients. Body mass index, smoking status, sex, ACQ-5, % predicted forced expiratory volume over 1 second (FEV1 p) and season were identified as statistically significant covariates affecting baseline hazard irrespective of ICS or ICS/LABA use. Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the baseline hazard (30.8%) relative to FP monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Interindividual differences at baseline and seasonal variation affect the exacerbation risk independently from drug treatment. Moreover, it appears that even when comparable level of symptom control is achieved in a group of patients, each individual may have a different exacerbation risk, depending on their baseline characteristics and time of the year. These findings highlight the importance of personalised interventions in moderate-to-severe asthma patients.