scispace - formally typeset
I

Inka Weissbecker

Researcher at International Medical Corps

Publications -  29
Citations -  1863

Inka Weissbecker is an academic researcher from International Medical Corps. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mental health & Psychosocial. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 26 publications receiving 1543 citations. Previous affiliations of Inka Weissbecker include Harvard University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Proposals for mental disorders specifically associated with stress in the International Classification of Diseases-11

TL;DR: The ICD-11 Working Group on this topic was asked to review scientifi c evidence and other information about use, clinical utility (as termed by WHO), and experience with relevant ICD10 diagnoses in various health care settings; to review proposals for the American Psychiatric Asso ciation's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM-5) and consider how these may be suitable or useful for global applications; and to assemble proposals for ICD11 with a focus on improving clinical utility.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strengthening mental health care systems for Syrian refugees in Europe and the Middle East: integrating scalable psychological interventions in eight countries.

TL;DR: This work provides an evidence-based rationale for the use of the scalable PM+ oriented programmes being adapted for Syrian refugees and provides information on the newly launched STRENGTHS programme for adapting, testing and scaling up of PM+ in various modalities in both neighbouring and European countries hosting Syrian refugees.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mindfulness meditation alleviates fibromyalgia symptoms in women: results of a randomized clinical trial.

TL;DR: MBSR ameliorated some of the major symptoms of fibromyalgia and reduced subjective illness burden and use of MBSR as a complementary treatment for women with Fibromyalgia is supported.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mental health and psychosocial support in crisis and conflict: report of the Mental Health Working Group.

TL;DR: The working group reached consensus that it would be unethical not to conduct research and evaluate outcomes of mental health and psychosocial interventions in emergency settings, given that there currently is very little good evidence base for such interventions.