J
Jack L. Vevea
Researcher at University of California, Merced
Publications - 34
Citations - 6882
Jack L. Vevea is an academic researcher from University of California, Merced. The author has contributed to research in topics: Publication bias & Random effects model. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 34 publications receiving 6129 citations. Previous affiliations of Jack L. Vevea include University of Chicago & University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Larry V. Hedges,Jack L. Vevea +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluate the performance of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests when each type of statistical procedure is used for each kind of inference and confirm that each procedure is best for making the kind of inferences for which it was designed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Sources of variability in children’s language growth
TL;DR: Results show substantial individual differences among children, and indicate that diversity of earlier caregiver speech significantly predicts corresponding diversity in later child speech, and that demographic factors, notably SES, are related to language growth, and are, at least partially, mediated by differences in caregiverspeech.
Journal ArticleDOI
Publication bias in research synthesis: sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions.
Jack L. Vevea,Carol M. Woods +1 more
TL;DR: A new approach is proposed that is suitable for application to meta-analytic data sets that are too small for the application of existing methods and estimates parameters relevant to fixed-effects, mixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis contingent on a hypothetical pattern of bias that is fixed independently of the data.
Journal ArticleDOI
Beyond the group mind: a quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect
TL;DR: This quantitative review of 130 comparisons of interindividual and inter group interactions in the context of mixed-motive situations reveals that intergroup interactions are generally more competitive than interindividual interactions.