J
James Bailey
Researcher at University of Melbourne
Publications - 394
Citations - 13628
James Bailey is an academic researcher from University of Melbourne. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cluster analysis & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 46, co-authored 377 publications receiving 10283 citations. Previous affiliations of James Bailey include University of London & Simon Fraser University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Adaptive control for nonlinear compartmental dynamical systems with applications to clinical pharmacology
TL;DR: A direct adaptive control framework for nonlinear uncertain nonnegative and compartmental systems with nonnegative control inputs is developed and guarantees partial asymptotic set-point regulation with respect to part of the closed-loop system states associated with the plant.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Efficient Mining of Contrast Patterns and Their Applications to Classification
TL;DR: This paper examines various kinds of contrast patterns and investigates efficient pattern mining techniques and discusses how to exploit patterns to construct effective classifiers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Efficient mining of platoon patterns in trajectory databases
TL;DR: This work proposes a novel algorithm to efficiently retrieve platoon patterns in large trajectory databases, using several pruning techniques, and demonstrates that the algorithm is able to achieve several orders of magnitude improvement in running time, compared to an existing method for retrieving moving object clusters.
Journal ArticleDOI
The importance and meaning of session behaviour in a MOOC
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined session behavioral data of 9272 learners in a MOOC and its relation to their engagement, grade and self-report data measuring aspects of self-regulated learning (SRL).
Journal ArticleDOI
Reference-Free Validation of Short Read Data
Jan Schröder,Jan Schröder,James Bailey,James Bailey,Thomas C. Conway,Justin Zobel,Justin Zobel +6 more
TL;DR: This work proposes analytical methods for identifying biases in a collection of short reads, without recourse to a reference, and shows that, surprisingly, strong biases appear to be present.