Jay Fuhrman

TL;DR: In this paper, the tradeoffs between food, water, and energy created by deploying different negative emissions technologies are discussed, and the authors highlight that delays in aggressive global mitigation action greatly increase the requirement for DAC to meet climate targets, and correspondingly, energy and water impacts.

TL;DR: Model inter-comparison results underpinning the IPCC’s special report on Global Warming of 1.5oC were used to explore the role that current assumptions are having on projections and the way in which emerging technologies, economic factors, innovation, and tradeoffs between negative emissions objectives and UN Sustainable Development Goals might have on future deployment of NETs.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors highlight the importance of the role of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) in net-zero emissions strategies and the impact of CDR deployment on the level of emission mitigation in the energy system and vice versa.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors use the Global Change Analysis Model to simulate how negative emissions technologies, in general, and direct air capture (DAC) in particular, could contribute to China's meeting this target.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors use the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) to understand the role of DACCS across all five SSPs for the below 2˚C and below 1.5˚c end-of-century warming goals.