Jerald Greenberg

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the reactions of both higher and lower status parties (e.g., their desire for future interaction) to their encounters with one another, in conjunction with the outcome favorability associated with the encounter and the other's procedural fairness.

TL;DR: The state of the science regarding the connection between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) as reflected by the articles included in this issue is discussed in this paper, where various conceptual issues such as the willingness of people to express inequity distress by withholding OCB, the relative importance of procedural justice compared to distributive justice as a determinant of OCB and the extent to which a reduction in OCB may reflect a desire to influence another individual, or the organization in general.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors advocate moving to the next step by testing such implications in theory-based studies that implement and assess the impact of interventions designed to promote organizational justice, and they also suggest that such investigations are conducted only rarely and that scholarly values favor research that addresses theoretical issues and that eschew practical applications.

TL;DR: In this article, the two factors (intimacy and interdependence) are combined to reflect one dimension of potential conflict over resources, and specific normative standards appear to be associated with each.

TL;DR: The field of organizational justice is characterized as being in its intellectual adolescence as discussed by the authors, and some signs of scientific maturity are noted, such as increased attention to the connections between organizational justice and various organizational processes, expanded efforts toward conceptual refinement, and greater reliance on research conducted in natural settings.