J
Jeroen van Beeck
Researcher at Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics
Publications - 60
Citations - 1151
Jeroen van Beeck is an academic researcher from Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics. The author has contributed to research in topics: Planetary boundary layer & Wind tunnel. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 60 publications receiving 918 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Bridging the Transition from Mesoscale to Microscale Turbulence in Numerical Weather Prediction Models
TL;DR: In this paper, the transition from one-dimensional turbulent diffusion in the mesoscale model to three-dimensional LES mixing does not necessarily result in an instantaneous development of turbulence in the LES domain.
Journal ArticleDOI
Numerical and experimental modelling of pollutant dispersion in a street canyon
TL;DR: In this article, a two-dimensional street canyon is studied in which the principal parameter is the height of the downstream building and the influence of a third building situated upstream of the street canyon in flow and dispersion inside the street.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Comprehensive Modelling Approach for the Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer: Consistent Inflow Conditions, Wall Function and Turbulence Model
Alessandro Parente,Alessandro Parente,Catherine Gorle,Catherine Gorle,Jeroen van Beeck,C. Benocci +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a novel approach for the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) modelling of the neutral atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), using the standard k-varepsilon turbulence model, is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
On the morphology of irregular rough particles from the analysis of speckle-like interferometric out-of-focus images
TL;DR: In this article, the Fourier transform of the out-of-focus image of an irregular rough particle is given by the 2 dimensional-autocorrelation of the shape of the particle.
Journal ArticleDOI
Extracorporeal bubbles: a word of caution.
TL;DR: Both the EDAC and Gampt can be used in a clinical setting for monitoring basal GME production, however, both devices have some major limitations when used for studying 'worst case' scenarios.