Deep learning is a form of machine learning that enables computers to learn from experience and understand the world in terms of a hierarchy of concepts. Because the computer gathers knowledge from experience, there is no need for a human computer operator to formally specify all the knowledge that the computer needs. The hierarchy of concepts allows the computer to learn complicated concepts by building them out of simpler ones; a graph of these hierarchies would be many layers deep. This book introduces a broad range of topics in deep learning. The text offers mathematical and conceptual background, covering relevant concepts in linear algebra, probability theory and information theory, numerical computation, and machine learning. It describes deep learning techniques used by practitioners in industry, including deep feedforward networks, regularization, optimization algorithms, convolutional networks, sequence modeling, and practical methodology; and it surveys such applications as natural language processing, speech recognition, computer vision, online recommendation systems, bioinformatics, and videogames. Finally, the book offers research perspectives, covering such theoretical topics as linear factor models, autoencoders, representation learning, structured probabilistic models, Monte Carlo methods, the partition function, approximate inference, and deep generative models. Deep Learning can be used by undergraduate or graduate students planning careers in either industry or research, and by software engineers who want to begin using deep learning in their products or platforms. A website offers supplementary material for both readers and instructors.

Deep Learning

From the Publisher:
A valuable reference for the novice as well as for the expert who needs a wider scope of coverage within the area of cryptography, this book provides easy and rapid access of information and includes more than 200 algorithms and protocols; more than 200 tables and figures; more than 1,000 numbered definitions, facts, examples, notes, and remarks; and over 1,250 significant references, including brief comments on each paper.

Handbook of Applied Cryptography

The success of machine learning algorithms generally depends on data representation, and we hypothesize that this is because different representations can entangle and hide more or less the different explanatory factors of variation behind the data. Although specific domain knowledge can be used to help design representations, learning with generic priors can also be used, and the quest for AI is motivating the design of more powerful representation-learning algorithms implementing such priors. This paper reviews recent work in the area of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning, covering advances in probabilistic models, autoencoders, manifold learning, and deep networks. This motivates longer term unanswered questions about the appropriate objectives for learning good representations, for computing representations (i.e., inference), and the geometrical connections between representation learning, density estimation, and manifold learning.

/pdf/representation-learning-a-review-and-new-perspectives-4sidphwbhg.pdf

Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives

This survey provides an overview of higher-order tensor decompositions, their applications, and available software. A tensor is a multidimensional or $N$-way array. Decompositions of higher-order tensors (i.e., $N$-way arrays with $N \geq 3$) have applications in psycho-metrics, chemometrics, signal processing, numerical linear algebra, computer vision, numerical analysis, data mining, neuroscience, graph analysis, and elsewhere. Two particular tensor decompositions can be considered to be higher-order extensions of the matrix singular value decomposition: CANDECOMP/PARAFAC (CP) decomposes a tensor as a sum of rank-one tensors, and the Tucker decomposition is a higher-order form of principal component analysis. There are many other tensor decompositions, including INDSCAL, PARAFAC2, CANDELINC, DEDICOM, and PARATUCK2 as well as nonnegative variants of all of the above. The N-way Toolbox, Tensor Toolbox, and Multilinear Engine are examples of software packages for working with tensors.

/pdf/tensor-decompositions-and-applications-46vl2ih5gn.pdf

Tensor Decompositions and Applications

Can machine learning deliver AI? Theoretical results, inspiration from the brain and cognition, as well as machine learning experiments suggest that in order to learn the kind of complicated functions that can represent high-level abstractions (e.g. in vision, language, and other AI-level tasks), one would need deep architectures. Deep architectures are composed of multiple levels of non-linear operations, such as in neural nets with many hidden layers, graphical models with many levels of latent variables, or in complicated propositional formulae re-using many sub-formulae. Each level of the architecture represents features at a different level of abstraction, defined as a composition of lower-level features. Searching the parameter space of deep architectures is a difficult task, but new algorithms have been discovered and a new sub-area has emerged in the machine learning community since 2006, following these discoveries. Learning algorithms such as those for Deep Belief Networks and other related unsupervised learning algorithms have recently been proposed to train deep architectures, yielding exciting results and beating the state-of-the-art in certain areas. Learning Deep Architectures for AI discusses the motivations for and principles of learning algorithms for deep architectures. By analyzing and comparing recent results with different learning algorithms for deep architectures, explanations for their success are proposed and discussed, highlighting challenges and suggesting avenues for future explorations in this area.

/pdf/learning-deep-architectures-for-ai-2358znl654.pdf

Learning Deep Architectures for AI

The random oracle hypothesis is false

We prove that unless NP = COR, Max Clique is hard to approximate wit hin polynomial time within a factor ni /2 ‘c for any c >0. This is done by constructing a proof system for NP w hich uses 1+6 amortized free bits for any ii >0. We build on the proof system of Bellare, Goldreich and Sudan, while seplacing their strict code-word test for the long code by a relaxed code-word test which is sufficient for the present purposes. The conclusion of this test is that if the test does not reject., then except wit h very small probability y, what the test saw is consistent with one of few possible code-words.

Testing of the long code and hardness for clique

We give a simple analysis of the PCP (probabilistically Checkable Proof) with low amortized query complexity of Samorodnitsky and Trevisan (2000). The analysis also applied to the linearity testing over finite fields, giving a better estimate of the acceptance probability in terms of the distance of the tested function to the closest linear function.

/pdf/simple-analysis-of-graph-tests-for-linearity-and-pcp-417gv213h9.pdf

Simple analysis of graph tests for linearity and PCP

We initiate the study of a new measure of approximation. This measure compares the performance of an approximation algorithm to the random assignment algorithm. This is a useful measure for optimization problems where the random assignment algorithm is known to give essentially the best possible polynomial time approximation. In this paper, we focus on this measure for the optimization problems Max-Lin-2 in which we need to maximize the number of satisfied linear equations in a system of linear equations modulo 2, and Max-k-Lin-2, a special case of the above problem in which each equation has at most k variables. The main techniques we use, in our approximation algorithms and inapproximability results for this measure, are from Fourier analysis and derandomization.

On the advantage over a random assignment

We study the security of individual bits in an RSA encrypted message E/sub N/(X). We show that given E/sub N/(X), predicting any single bit in x with only a non-negligible advantage over the trivial guessing strategy is (through a polynomial time reduction) as hard as breaking RSA. We briefly discuss a related result for bit security of the discrete logarithm.

Johan Håstad

Papers

The random oracle hypothesis is false

Testing of the long code and hardness for clique

Simple analysis of graph tests for linearity and PCP

On the advantage over a random assignment

The security of individual RSA bits