J
Jonathan Rogers
Researcher at University College London
Publications - 74
Citations - 5597
Jonathan Rogers is an academic researcher from University College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Catatonia. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 54 publications receiving 4120 citations. Previous affiliations of Jonathan Rogers include Bethlem Royal Hospital & King's College London.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Jonathan Rogers,Edward Chesney,Dominic Oliver,Thomas A Pollak,Thomas A Pollak,Philip McGuire,Paolo Fusar-Poli,Michael S. Zandi,Glyn Lewis,Anthony S. David +9 more
TL;DR: The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that during the acute illness, common symptoms among patients admitted to hospital for SARS or MERS included confusion and depression, and in one study traumatic memories.
Journal ArticleDOI
Credibility of Management Forecasts
TL;DR: The authors examined how the market's ability to assess the truthfulness of management earnings forecasts affects how managers bias their forecasts, and evaluated whether the market response to management forecasts is consistent with it identifying predictable forecast bias.
Journal ArticleDOI
Disclosure Tone and Shareholder Litigation
TL;DR: The authors examined the relation between disclosure tone and shareholder litigation to determine whether managers' use of optimistic language increases litigation risk and found that plaintiffs target more optimistic statements in their lawsuits and that sued firms' earnings announcements are unusually optimistic relative to other firms experiencing similar economic circumstances.
Posted Content
Shareholder Litigation and Changes in Disclosure Behavior
TL;DR: This article examined changes in the disclosure behavior of firms involved in 827 disclosure-related class-action securities litigation cases filed between 1996 and 2005 and found no evidence that the firms in their sample respond to the litigation event by increasing or improving their disclosures to investors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Credibility of Management Forecasts
TL;DR: The authors examine how the market's ability to assess the truthfulness of management earnings forecasts affects the extent to which managers bias their forecasts, and evaluate whether the market response to management forecasts is consistent with it identifying the predictable bias in forecasts.