Kamila E. Sip

TL;DR: With the increasing interest in the neuroimaging of deception and its commercial application, there is a need to pay more attention to methodology and paradigms.

TL;DR: This experiment tests how people produce and detect deception while playing a computerized version of the dice game, Meyer, and suggests that the activity in BA10 is associated with the development of high-level executive strategies involved in both types of claim, while the premotor and parietal activity is associatedwith the need to select which particular claim to make.

TL;DR: The results show that participants were slower to give honest responses than to give deceptive responses when they knew more about the display and could use this knowledge for their own benefit, suggesting the decision to deceive is affected by the potential risk of social confrontation rather than the claim itself.

TL;DR: Social closeness is highlighted as an important factor in understanding the impact of SFB on neural mechanisms of decision-making and the level of closeness with feedback provider (friend, confederate) and the framing effect was observed in both experiments.

TL;DR: As framing susceptibility increased, the MPFC increased connectivity with DMN; in contrast, temporal‐parietal junction decreased connectivity with the ECN, highlighting how functional connectivity patterns with distinct neural networks contribute to idiosyncratic behavioral changes.