scispace - formally typeset
K

Kornelis Blok

Researcher at Delft University of Technology

Publications -  183
Citations -  9760

Kornelis Blok is an academic researcher from Delft University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Efficient energy use & Energy consumption. The author has an hindex of 54, co-authored 176 publications receiving 8533 citations. Previous affiliations of Kornelis Blok include Utrecht University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Olefins from conventional and heavy feedstocks: Energy use in steam cracking and alternative processes

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an overview of state-of-the-art naphtha cracking technologies and show that up to 20% savings on the current average process energy use are possible.

Emission Reduction of Greenhouse Gases from the Cement Industry

TL;DR: A wide range of options exist to reduce CO 2 emissions considerably as discussed by the authors, including calcination and combustion processes, from cement production, which accounts for about half of global carbon dioxide emissions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Response to 'Burden of proof': A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems'

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors of the article "Burden of proof: a comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems" claim that many studies of 100 % renewable electricity systems do not demonstrate sufficient technical feasibility, according to the criteria of the authors (henceforth "the authors").
Journal ArticleDOI

The direct and indirect energy requirements of households in the Netherlands

TL;DR: In this article, the authors found that the total average energy demand per household in the Netherlands in 1990 was 240 GJ, of which 54% was indirect and the elasticity of the energy requirement with respect to income was found to be 0.63.
Journal ArticleDOI

Steam cracking and methane to olefins: Energy use, CO2 emissions and production costs

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the energy use, CO2 emissions and production costs of methanol and Oxidative coupling routes with those of steam cracking routes and found that methane-based routes use more than twice as much process energy than state-of-the-art steam-cracking routes.