Laura Brandimarte

TL;DR: This article found that participants on both platforms were more naive and less dishonest compared to MTurk participants, and ProA and CrowdFlower participants produced data quality that was higher than CF's and comparable to M-Turk's.

TL;DR: This Review summarizes and draws connections between diverse streams of empirical research on privacy behavior: people’s uncertainty about the consequences of privacy-related behaviors and their own preferences over those consequences; the context-dependence of people's concern about privacy; and the degree to which privacy concerns are malleable—manipulable by commercial and governmental interests.

TL;DR: This work test the hypothesis that increasing individuals’ perceived control over the release and access of private information will increase their willingness to disclose sensitive information, and highlights how technologies designed to protect people can end up exacerbating the risks they face.

TL;DR: This article focuses on research on assisting individuals’ privacy and security choices with soft paternalistic interventions that nudge users toward more beneficial choices and identifies key ethical, design, and research challenges.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a multi-disciplinary assessment of the literature pertaining to privacy and security decision making, and highlight potential benefits of those interventions, highlight their shortcomings, and identify key ethical, design, and research challenges.