M
M. Tina Dacin
Researcher at Queen's University
Publications - 49
Citations - 14282
M. Tina Dacin is an academic researcher from Queen's University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Institutional theory & Social entrepreneurship. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 46 publications receiving 13023 citations. Previous affiliations of M. Tina Dacin include College of Business Administration & Texas A&M University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Institutional theory and institutional change: introduction to the special research forum
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors put forth a call for papers on the study of institutional theory and institutional change, and they received over 75 manuscripts for review, with a focus on institutional change.
Journal ArticleDOI
Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives
TL;DR: In this paper, a study of the international partner selection of firms from emerging (Mexico, Poland, and Romania) and developed (Canada, France, and the United States) markets supports resource-based and organizational learning explanations of such partner selection, a critical factor for success with international strategic alliances.
Journal ArticleDOI
Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions
TL;DR: In this article, a review of the literature suggests that international management applications of this perspective have been dominated by a narrow set of neo-institutional ideas, and they develop a set of provocations that challenge the validity of traditional neoinstitutionalism in the context of MNCs.
Journal ArticleDOI
Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the current state of the social entrepreneurship literature, asking what is unique about social entrepreneurship and what avenues create opportunities for the future of the field and conclude that while it is not a distinct type of entrepreneurship, researchers stand to benefit most from further research on social entrepreneurship as a context in which established types of entrepreneurs operate.