scispace - formally typeset
M

María José Granados-Muñoz

Researcher at University of Granada

Publications -  67
Citations -  1607

María José Granados-Muñoz is an academic researcher from University of Granada. The author has contributed to research in topics: Lidar & Aerosol. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 61 publications receiving 1293 citations. Previous affiliations of María José Granados-Muñoz include Jet Propulsion Laboratory & Polytechnic University of Catalonia.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Overview of the Chemistry-Aerosol Mediterranean Experiment/Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing on the Mediterranean Climate (ChArMEx/ADRIMED) summer 2013 campaign

TL;DR: A special observing period (SOP-1a) including intensive airborne measurements was performed in the framework of the Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing on the Mediterranean Climate (ADRIMED) project during the Mediterranean dry season over the western and central Mediterranean basins, with a focus on aerosol-radiation measurements and their modeling as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of hygroscopic growth on the aerosol light-scattering coefficient: A review of measurements, techniques and error sources

TL;DR: In this article, the authors defined the scattering enhancement factor (f(RH) as the ratio between the scattering coefficient and the scattering coeffecyclic coefficient, which is defined as a function of the ratio of scattering coefficient to scattering coefficient.
Journal ArticleDOI

Automatic determination of the planetary boundary layer height using lidar: One‐year analysis over southeastern Spain

TL;DR: In this paper, a method based on the wavelet covariance transform (WCT) applied to lidar data is tested as an automated and non-supervised method to obtain the planetary boundary layer (PBL) height.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lidar-Radiometer Inversion Code (LIRIC) for the retrieval of vertical aerosol properties from combined lidar/radiometer data: development and distribution in EARLINET

TL;DR: In this article, a detailed description of LIRIC (LIdar-Radiometer Inversion Code) algorithm for simultaneous processing of coincident lidar and radiometric (sun photometric) observations for the retrieval of the aerosol concentration vertical profiles is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

A methodology for investigating dust model performance using synergistic EARLINET/AERONET dust concentration retrievals

Abstract: . Systematic measurements of dust concentration profiles at a continental scale were recently made possible by the development of synergistic retrieval algorithms using combined lidar and sun photometer data and the establishment of robust remote-sensing networks in the framework of Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure Network (ACTRIS)/European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET). We present a methodology for using these capabilities as a tool for examining the performance of dust transport models. The methodology includes considerations for the selection of a suitable data set and appropriate metrics for the exploration of the results. The approach is demonstrated for four regional dust transport models (BSC-DREAM8b v2, NMMB/BSC-DUST, DREAMABOL, DREAM8-NMME-MACC) using dust observations performed at 10 ACTRIS/EARLINET stations. The observations, which include coincident multi-wavelength lidar and sun photometer measurements, were processed with the Lidar-Radiometer Inversion Code (LIRIC) to retrieve aerosol concentration profiles. The methodology proposed here shows advantages when compared to traditional evaluation techniques that utilize separately the available measurements such as separating the contribution of dust from other aerosol types on the lidar profiles and avoiding model assumptions related to the conversion of concentration fields to aerosol extinction values. When compared to LIRIC retrievals, the simulated dust vertical structures were found to be in good agreement for all models with correlation values between 0.5 and 0.7 in the 1–6 km range, where most dust is typically observed. The absolute dust concentration was typically underestimated with mean bias values of -40 to -20 μg m−3 at 2 km, the altitude of maximum mean concentration. The reported differences among the models found in this comparison indicate the benefit of the systematic use of the proposed approach in future dust model evaluation studies.