scispace - formally typeset
M

Marie Bryce

Researcher at University of Plymouth

Publications -  29
Citations -  292

Marie Bryce is an academic researcher from University of Plymouth. The author has contributed to research in topics: Revalidation & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 24 publications receiving 203 citations. Previous affiliations of Marie Bryce include University of Exeter.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of patient feedback on the medical performance of qualified doctors: a systematic review.

TL;DR: The main factors found to influence the impact of patient feedback were: specificity; perceived credibility; congruence with physician self-perceptions and performance expectations; presence of facilitation and reflection; and inclusion of narrative comments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: a realist review protocol.

TL;DR: The aim of this research is to understand how and why appraisal of doctors is supposed to produce its effect and to synthesise the final programme theory of the impact of appraisal on doctors’ performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards an understanding of how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: a realist review.

TL;DR: A realist review of the literature was utilised to explore issues, as they generate context‐mechanism‐outcome (CMO) configurations, resulting in the creation of theories of how and why appraisal of doctors produces its effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient and public involvement in medical performance processes: A systematic review.

TL;DR: Patient and public involvement (PPI) continues to develop as a central policy agenda in health care and the patient voice is seen as relevant, informative and can drive service improvement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implementing medical revalidation in the United Kingdom: Findings about organisational changes and impacts from a survey of Responsible Officers:

TL;DR: Revalidation appears primarily to have improved systems for quality improvement and the management of poor performance to date, but there is more to be done to ensure it produces wider benefits, particularly in relation to doctors who already perform well.