M
Markus B. Scheidegger
Researcher at ETH Zurich
Publications - 46
Citations - 9190
Markus B. Scheidegger is an academic researcher from ETH Zurich. The author has contributed to research in topics: Magnetic resonance imaging & Blood flow. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 46 publications receiving 8786 citations. Previous affiliations of Markus B. Scheidegger include Philips & University of Zurich.
Papers
More filters
PatentDOI
SENSE: Sensitivity Encoding for fast MRI
TL;DR: The problem of image reconstruction from sensitivity encoded data is formulated in a general fashion and solved for arbitrary coil configurations and k‐space sampling patterns and special attention is given to the currently most practical case, namely, sampling a common Cartesian grid with reduced density.
Journal ArticleDOI
Alterations in the Local Myocardial Motion Pattern in Patients Suffering From Pressure Overload Due to Aortic Stenosis
Matthias Stuber,Markus B. Scheidegger,Stefan Fischer,Eike Nagel,F Steinemann,O M Hess,Peter Boesiger +6 more
TL;DR: Torsional behavior as observed in pressure- and volume-overloaded hearts is consistent with current theoretical findings and may contribute to a tendency toward diastolic dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cardiac rotation and relaxation in patients with aortic valve stenosis
Eike Nagel,Matthias Stuber,B Burkhard,Stefan Fischer,Markus B. Scheidegger,Peter Boesiger,Otto M. Hess +6 more
TL;DR: Left ventricular pressure overload hypertrophy is associated with a reduction in basal and an increase in apical rotation resulting in increased torsion of the ventricle.
Journal ArticleDOI
Hemodynamics in the carotid artery bifurcation: a comparison between numerical simulations and in vitro MRI measurements.
ReneH Botnar,Gerhard Rappitsch,Markus B. Scheidegger,D. Liepsch,Karl Perktold,Peter Boesiger +5 more
TL;DR: Qualitative comparison of the axial velocity patterns revealed no significant differences between simulations and in vitro measurements, and secondary flow patterns revealed some minor differences concerning the form of the vortices but maximum circumferential velocities were in the same range for both methods.
Journal ArticleDOI
Force and torque effects of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs.
TL;DR: In conclusion, modern pacemakers present no safety risk with respect to magnetic force and torque induced by the static magnetic field of a 1.5‐Tesla MRI scanner, however, ICD devices, despite considerable reduction in size and weight, may still pose problems due to strong magneticforce and torque.