scispace - formally typeset
M

Martin K. Stiles

Researcher at University of Auckland

Publications -  113
Citations -  3959

Martin K. Stiles is an academic researcher from University of Auckland. The author has contributed to research in topics: Atrial fibrillation & Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The author has an hindex of 27, co-authored 100 publications receiving 3174 citations. Previous affiliations of Martin K. Stiles include Waikato Hospital & University of Adelaide.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Outcomes of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review.

TL;DR: The variation in success within and between techniques suggests that the optimal ablation technique for long-standing persistent AF is unclear.
Journal ArticleDOI

Paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation is associated with an abnormal atrial substrate: characterizing the "second factor".

TL;DR: Patients with paroxysmal lone AF, remote from arrhythmia, demonstrate bi-atrial abnormalities characterized by structural change, conduction abnormalities, and sinus node dysfunction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Atrial remodeling in obstructive sleep apnea: implications for atrial fibrillation

TL;DR: OSA is associated with significant atrial remodeling characterized by atrial enlargement, reduction in voltage, site-specific and widespread conduction abnormalities, and longer sinus node recovery, which may in part explain the association between OSA and AF.
Journal ArticleDOI

2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors systematically describe the >80% (83-100%, mean: 96%) required consensus achieved for each recommendation by official balloting in regard to the programming of bradycardia mode and rate, detection, tachycardia therapy, and intraprocedural testing of defibrillation efficacy.
Journal ArticleDOI

2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

TL;DR: This document systematically describes the >80% (83–100%, mean: 96%) required consensus achieved for each recommendation by official balloting in regard to the programming of (i) bradycardia mode and rate, (ii) tachycardia detection, (iii) tachedcardia therapy, and (iv) the intraprocedural testing of defibrillation efficacy.