In the early 19th century, building on observations of microscopists now ancient, Schleiden and Schwann formulated the doctrine that cells are building blocks for plant and animal tissues (1). By the mid-19th century, Raspail, Remak, and Virchow expanded this hypothesis by suggesting that all cells come from preexisting cells — the so-called cell theory. Although referring to cell division, this now classic notion is prescient of another contemporary twist in the biology of cell maturation: beyond lineage development and normal differentiation, mature epithelial cells under new environmental pressures exhibit a local plasticity that allows them to morph into other mature phenotypes with or without proliferation (2, 3). Growing interest in the biology of these cellular transitions helped both establish epithelial cell plasticity as a field of study in the late 20th century and fashion much of the current thinking regarding morphogenesis in early embryonic development, tissue repair, and cancer metastasis (4–6). The details of some of these processes are not discussed here, as they are outlined in other articles in this Review Series on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (7, 8). Instead, we offer a personal view gathered from our own experience and the literature regarding an approach documenting EMT events in culture or tissue. We hope this serves to stimulate other points of view as new data emerge.

/pdf/biomarkers-for-epithelial-mesenchymal-transitions-4rugbye0ja.pdf

Biomarkers for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions

Among the membrane compartments of a cell, vesicles known as "caveolae" have long defied functional characterization. However, since the identification of a family of proteins termed "caveolins", that form and reside in caveolae, a better understanding has emerged. It is now clear that caveolae do not merely play a singular role in the cell, but are pleiotropic in nature-serving to modulate many cellular functions. The purpose of this review is to explicate what is known about caveolins/caveolae and highlight growing areas of caveolar research.

Caveolae: From Cell Biology to Animal Physiology

Historically, the term ‘keratin’ stood for all of the proteins extracted from skin modifications, such as horns, claws and hooves. Subsequently, it was realized that this keratin is actually a mixture of keratins, keratin filament-associated proteins and other proteins, such as enzymes. Keratins were then defined as certain filament-forming proteins with specific physicochemical properties and extracted from the cornified layer of the epidermis, whereas those filament-forming proteins that were extracted from the living layers of the epidermis were grouped as ‘prekeratins’ or ‘cytokeratins’. Currently, the term ‘keratin’ covers all intermediate filament-forming proteins with specific physicochemical properties and produced in any vertebrate epithelia. Similarly, the nomenclature of epithelia as cornified, keratinized or non-keratinized is based historically on the notion that only the epidermis of skin modifications such as horns, claws and hooves is cornified, that the non-modified epidermis is a keratinized stratified epithelium, and that all other stratified and non-stratified epithelia are non-keratinized epithelia. At this point in time, the concepts of keratins and of keratinized or cornified epithelia need clarification and revision concerning the structure and function of keratin and keratin filaments in various epithelia of different species, as well as of keratin genes and their modifications, in view of recent research, such as the sequencing of keratin proteins and their genes, cell culture, transfection of epithelial cells, immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting. Recently, new functions of keratins and keratin filaments in cell signaling and intracellular vesicle transport have been discovered. It is currently understood that all stratified epithelia are keratinized and that some of these keratinized stratified epithelia cornify by forming a Stratum corneum. The processes of keratinization and cornification in skin modifications are different especially with respect to the keratins that are produced. Future research in keratins will provide a better understanding of the processes of keratinization and cornification of stratified epithelia, including those of skin modifications, of the adaptability of epithelia in general, of skin diseases, and of the changes in structure and function of epithelia in the course of evolution. This review focuses on keratins and keratin filaments in mammalian tissue but keratins in the tissues of some other vertebrates are also considered.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01066.x

Structure and functions of keratin proteins in simple, stratified, keratinized and cornified epithelia

Keratin: Structure, mechanical properties, occurrence in biological organisms, and efforts at bioinspiration

Evidence is growing to support a functional role for the prion protein (PrP) in copper metabolism. Copper ions appear to bind to the protein in a highly conserved octapeptide repeat region (sequence PHGGGWGQ) near the N terminus. To delineate the site and mode of binding of Cu(II) to the PrP, the copper-binding properties of peptides of varying lengths corresponding to 2-, 3-, and 4-octarepeat sequences have been probed by using various spectroscopic techniques. A two-octarepeat peptide binds a single Cu(II) ion with Kd ' 6 mM whereas a four-octarepeat peptide coopera- tively binds four Cu(II) ions. Circular dichroism spectra indicate a distinctive structuring of the octarepeat region on Cu(II) binding. Visible absorption, visible circular dichroism, and electron spin resonance spectra suggest that the coordi- nation sphere of the copper is identical for 2, 3, or 4 octare- peats, consisting of a square-planar geometry with three nitrogen ligands and one oxygen ligand. Consistent with the pH dependence of Cu(II) binding, proton NMR spectroscopy indicates that the histidine residues in each octarepeat are coordinated to the Cu(II) ion. Our working model for the structure of the complex shows the histidine residues in successive octarepeats bridged between two copper ions, with both the N«2 and Nd1 imidazole nitrogen of each histidine residue coordinated and the remaining coordination sites occupied by a backbone amide nitrogen and a water molecule. This arrangement accounts for the cooperative nature of complex formation and for the apparent evolutionary require- ment for four octarepeats in the PrP.

Copper binding to the prion protein: Structural implications of four identical cooperative binding sites (octarepeat peptidesynuclear magnetic resonanceycircular dichroismyelectron spin resonance)

Cytochemical, biochemical and molecular aspects of the process of keratinization in the epidermis of reptilian scales.

Beta-keratins form the hard corneous material of reptilian scales. In the present review, the distribution and molecular characteristics of beta-keratins in reptiles are presented. In lepidosaurians immunoreactive, protein bands at 12-18 kDa are generally present with less frequent proteins at higher molecular weight. In chelonians, bands at 13-18 and 22-24 kDa are detected. In crocodilians, bands at 14-20 kDa and weaker bands at 30-32 kDa are seen. Protein bands above 25 kDa are probably polymerized beta-keratins or aggregates. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis shows that beta-keratins are mainly basic and that acidic-neutral keratins may derive from post-translational modifications. Beta-keratins comprise glycine-proline-rich and cystein-proline-rich proteins of 13-19 kDa. Beta-keratin genes may or may not contain introns and are present in multiple copies with a linear organization as in avian beta-keratin genes. Despite amino acid differences toward N- and C-terminals all beta-keratins share high homology in their central, beta-folded region of 20 amino acids, indicated as core-box. This region is implicated in the formation of beta-keratin filaments of scales, claws, and feathers. The homology of the core-box suggests that these proteins evolved from a progenitor sequence present in the stem of reptiles. Beta-keratins have diversified in their amino acid sequences producing secondary (and tertiary) conformations that suited them for their mechanical role in scales. In birds, a small beta-keratin has allowed the formation of feathers. It is suggested that beta-keratins represent the reptilian counterpart of keratin associated or matrix proteins present in mammalian hairs, claws, and horns.

Hard (Beta-)keratins in the epidermis of reptiles: composition, sequence, and molecular organization.

Colocalization prostacyclin (PGI2) synthase--caveolin-1 in endothelial cells and new roles for PGI2 in angiogenesis.

Hard skin appendages in amniotes comprise scales, feathers and hairs. The cell organization of these appendages probably derived from the localization of specialized areas of dermal–epidermal interaction in the integument. The horny scales and the other derivatives were formed from large areas of dermal–epidermal interaction. The evolution of these skin appendages was characterized by the production of specific coiled-coil keratins and associated proteins in the inter-filament matrix. Unlike mammalian keratin-associated proteins, those of sauropsids contain a double beta-folded sequence of about 20 amino acids, known as the core-box. The core-box shows 60%–95% sequence identity with known reptilian and avian proteins. The core-box determines the polymerization of these proteins into filaments indicated as beta-keratin filaments. The nucleotide and derived amino acid sequences for these sauropsid keratin-associated proteins are presented in conjunction with a hypothesis about their evolution in reptiles-birds compared to mammalian keratin-associated proteins. It is suggested that genes coding for ancestral glycine-serine-rich sequences of alpha-keratins produced a new class of small matrix proteins. In sauropsids, matrix proteins may have originated after mutation and enrichment in proline, probably in a central region of the ancestral protein. This mutation gave rise to the core-box, and other regions of the original protein evolved differently in the various reptilians orders. In lepidosaurians, two main groups, the high glycine proline and the high cysteine proline proteins, were formed. In archosaurians and chelonians two main groups later diversified into the high glycine proline tyrosine, non-feather proteins, and into the glycine-tyrosine-poor group of feather proteins, which evolved in birds. The latter proteins were particularly suited for making the elongated barb/barbule cells of feathers. In therapsids-mammals, mutations of the ancestral proteins formed the high glycine-tyrosine or the high cysteine proteins but no core-box was produced in the matrix proteins of the hard corneous material of mammalian derivatives.

Mattia Toni

Papers

Cytochemical, biochemical and molecular aspects of the process of keratinization in the epidermis of reptilian scales.

Hard (Beta-)keratins in the epidermis of reptiles: composition, sequence, and molecular organization.

Colocalization prostacyclin (PGI2) synthase--caveolin-1 in endothelial cells and new roles for PGI2 in angiogenesis.

Evolution of hard proteins in the sauropsid integument in relation to the cornification of skin derivatives in amniotes

Involvement of caveolae and caveolae-like domains in signalling, cell survival and angiogenesis