https://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hep.27548

Multicenter randomized controlled trial of percutaneous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

The Stockholm-3 Model for Prostate Cancer Detection: Algorithm Update, Biomarker Contribution, and Reflex Test Potential.

Summary Background Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduces prostate cancer mortality but can lead to adverse outcomes. We aimed to compare a traditional screening approach with a diagnostic strategy of blood-based risk prediction combined with MRI-targeted biopsies. Methods We did a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial (STHLM3-MRI) in Stockholm county, Sweden. Men aged 50–74 years were randomly selected by Statistics Sweden and invited by mail to participate in screening; those with an elevated risk of prostate cancer, defined as either a PSA of 3 ng/mL or higher or a Stockholm3 score of 0·11 or higher were eligible for randomisation. Men with a previous prostate cancer diagnosis, who had undergone a prostate biopsy within 60 days before the invitation to participate, with a contraindication for MRI, or with severe illness were excluded. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (2:3) using computer-generated blocks of five, stratified by clinically significant prostate cancer risk, to receive either systematic prostate biopsies (standard group) or biparametric MRI followed by MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy in MRI-positive participants (experimental group). The primary outcome was the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at prostate biopsy, defined as a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or higher. We used a margin of 0·78 to assess non-inferiority for the primary outcome. Key secondary outcome measures included the proportion of men with clinically insignificant prostate cancer (defined as a Gleason score of 3 + 3), and the number of any prostate MRI and biopsy procedures done. We did two comparisons: Stockholm3 (using scores of 0·11 and 0·15 as cutoffs) versus PSA in the experimental group (paired analyses) and PSA plus standard biopsy versus Stockholm3 plus MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy (unpaired, randomised analyses). All analyses were intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03377881 . Findings Between Feb 5, 2018, and March 4, 2020, 49 118 men were invited to participate, of whom 12 750 were enrolled and provided blood specimens, and 2293 with elevated risk were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=1372) or the standard group (n=921). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer was 0·76 (95% CI 0·72–0·80) for Stockholm3 and 0·60 (0·54–0·65) for PSA. In the experimental group, a Stockholm3 of 0·11 or higher was non-inferior to a PSA of 3 ng/mL or higher for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (227 vs 192; relative proportion [RP] 1·18 [95% CI 1·09–1·28], p Interpretation The Stockholm3 test can inform risk stratification before MRI and targeted biopsies in prostate cancer screening. Combining the Stockholm3 test with an MRI-targeted biopsy approach for prostate cancer screening decreases overdetection while maintaining the ability to detect clinically significant cancer. Funding The Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Research Council, and Stockholm City Council.

Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

Treatment of solid tumors by ablation techniques has gained momentum in the recent years due to their technical simplicity and reduced morbidity as juxtaposed to surgery. Cryoablation is one of such techniques, known for its uniqueness to destroy the tumors by freezing to lethal temperatures. Freezing the tumor locally and allowing it to remain in situ unleashes an array of tumor antigens to be exposed to the immune system, paving the way for the generation of anti-tumor immune responses. However, the immune responses triggered in most cases are insufficient to eradicate the tumors with systemic spread. Therefore, combination of cryoablation and immunotherapy is a new treatment strategy currently being evaluated for its efficacy, notably in patients with metastatic disease. This article examines the mechanistic fabric of cryoablation for the generation of an effective immune response against the tumors, and various possibilities of its combination with different immunotherapies that are capable of inducing exceptional therapeutic responses. The combinatorial treatment avenues discussed in this article if explored in sufficient profundity, could reach the pinnacle of future cancer medicine.

/pdf/cryoablation-and-immunotherapy-an-enthralling-synergy-to-2m9215ql4b.pdf

Cryoablation and Immunotherapy: An Enthralling Synergy to Confront the Tumors.

Focal cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus: impact on treatment response and postprocedural pain

Cryotherapy techniques date back as far as the mid-1800s, when James Arnott demonstrated the effectiveness of salt/ice mixtures in palliation of breast, uterine, and skin cancers. Subsequent advances saw the use of liquid air and solid carbon dioxide in the treatment of various conditions, particularly benign dermatologic lesions (1). Cooper and Lee introduced the first automated cryosurgical apparatus cooled by circulating liquid nitrogen in 1961 and initially used it for treating neuromuscular disorders (2). Liquid nitrogen probes were soon being used in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer, though complications were quite common, resulting in the procedures falling out of favor until the 1990s, when intraoperative ultrasound techniques were developed, allowing more accurate monitoring of the freezing process (1). The advent of "third-generation" argon and helium gas probes in 2000 and preoperative computer thermal mapping techniques have allowed even more precise placement, temperature control, and further reduction in post-procedural morbidity (3). Cryosurgical techniques are currently used to treat a wide variety of conditions, but significant urologic indications include treatment of low and intermediate risk prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma < 4 cm in diameter.

/pdf/biophysiologic-considerations-in-cryoablation-a-practical-uin1fqv4pq.pdf

Biophysiologic considerations in cryoablation: a practical mechanistic molecular review

https://jdc.jefferson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=urologyfp

Michael Maccini

Papers

Biophysiologic considerations in cryoablation: a practical mechanistic molecular review

An Approach Using PSA Levels of 1.5 ng/mL as the Cutoff for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care

Mp39-07 the 4kscore can potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with suspicious psa in a screening population

Pd36-08 how to improve pubovaginal sling outcomes: comparison of two techniques for sling tensioning in 177 patients