M
Mildred K. Cho
Researcher at Stanford University
Publications - 190
Citations - 19879
Mildred K. Cho is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Research ethics & Informed consent. The author has an hindex of 48, co-authored 175 publications receiving 18730 citations. Previous affiliations of Mildred K. Cho include Seattle Children's Research Institute & University of Western Ontario.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Ethical issues in using ambient intelligence in health-care settings
Nicole Martinez-Martin,Zelun Luo,Amit Kaushal,Ehsan Adeli,Albert Haque,Sara S Kelly,Sarah Wieten,Mildred K. Cho,David Magnus,Li Fei-Fei,Kevin A. Schulman,Arnold Milstein +11 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the ethical challenges of collecting large amounts of sensor data in health care settings, particularly in terms of privacy, data management, bias and fairness, and informed consent.
Journal ArticleDOI
Racial and ethnic categories in biomedical research: there is no baby in the bathwater.
TL;DR: It is argued that race is too undefined and fluid to be useful as a proxy for biology or genetics.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cell-free fetal DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy and beyond: clinical integration challenges in the US context
TL;DR: It is argued that there is an urgent need for policy-makers, regulators and professional societies to provide guidance on the most efficient and ethical manner for cffDNA tests to be introduced into clinical practice in the USA.
Journal ArticleDOI
How Do Women Decide? Accepting or Declining BRCA1/2 Testing in a Nationwide Clinical Sample in the United States
TL;DR: The decision to accept or decline genetic testing is the result of a complex process that goes beyond interactions between health care providers and patients, indicating a caution against exclusive reliance on informed consent or counseling encounters.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative
TL;DR: While the IRB system remains the foundation for the ethical review of research, REC can be a valuable service for investigators, regulators, and research participants aligned with the goal of supporting ethical research.