M
Mildred K. Cho
Researcher at Stanford University
Publications - 190
Citations - 19879
Mildred K. Cho is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Research ethics & Informed consent. The author has an hindex of 48, co-authored 175 publications receiving 18730 citations. Previous affiliations of Mildred K. Cho include Seattle Children's Research Institute & University of Western Ontario.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Diverse experts' perspectives on ethical issues of using machine learning to predict HIV/AIDS risk in sub-Saharan Africa: a modified Delphi study.
TL;DR: In this paper, a semi-structured survey using a modified Delphi approach was conducted to understand diverse experts' views about the ethical implications of ongoing research funded by the National Institutes of Health that uses machine learning to predict HIV/AIDS risk in sub-Saharan Africa based on publicly available Demographic and Health Surveys data.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Typology of Existing Machine Learning–Based Predictive Analytic Tools Focused on Reducing Costs and Improving Quality in Health Care: Systematic Search and Content Analysis
Ariadne A Nichol,Jason N Batten,Meghan C. Halley,Julia K Axelrod,Pamela Sankar,Mildred K. Cho +5 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify and characterize available MLPA health care products, identifying and characterizing claims about products recently or currently in use in US health care settings that are marketed as tools to improve health care efficiency by improving quality of care while reducing costs.
Journal ArticleDOI
Data sharing and community-engaged research
TL;DR: Data sharing must be accompanied by responsibility sharing in the context of shared values.
Journal ArticleDOI
Informed Consent for Research on Medical Practices
TL;DR: This is the first study that attempts to assess how the public views the tradeoff between consent and the value of research, and it suggests a lack of alignment between public views and those of most of the persons whom the authors surveyed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Defining the Scope and Improving the Quality of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Response to Open Peer Commentaries About the National Collaborative
TL;DR: This work responds to a number of key considerations highlighted by commentators, including the role and scope of research ethics consultation, relationships with other institutional services and programs, efforts to ensure the quality of consultations provided, and the feasibility of widespread REC services.