Mildred K. Cho

TL;DR: The issues of informed consent, privacy, data ownership and technology regulation as they relate to the emerging field of personalized medicine and genomics are reviewed.

TL;DR: Most digital contact tracing projects in the United States and Europe have prioritized privacy protections in the form of local storage of data on smartphones and the deidentification of information, but in the prioritization of privacy in this narrow form there is not sufficient attention given to weighing ethical trade‐offs within the context of a public health pandemic.

TL;DR: It is anticipated that releasing this large-scale collection of real-world physical activity, fitness, sleep, and cardiovascular health data will enable the research community to work collaboratively towards improving the understanding of the relationship between cardiovascular indicators, lifestyle, and overall health.

TL;DR: Although these tests could provide value to customers by offering tools for social networking or genealogy, there are questions about whether and how to regulate these tests and about the extent to which they provide medical information.

TL;DR: It is proposed that the CADRe rubrics include the primary issues necessary to guide communication recommendations, and are ready for pilot testing by nongenetics clinicians.