scispace - formally typeset
M

Myles-Jay Linton

Researcher at University of Bristol

Publications -  15
Citations -  428

Myles-Jay Linton is an academic researcher from University of Bristol. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mental health & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 10 publications receiving 254 citations. Previous affiliations of Myles-Jay Linton include National Institute for Health Research & University of Exeter.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time

TL;DR: The striking variability between instruments supports the need to pay close attention to what is being assessed under the umbrella of ‘well-being’ measurement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Living Under Coronavirus and Injecting Drugs in Bristol (LUCID-B): A qualitative study of experiences of COVID-19 among people who inject drugs.

TL;DR: In this paper, a telephone semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 injecting drug users in Bristol, Southwest of England to examine their experiences relating to the COVID-19 public health measures; changes to opioid substitution therapy (OST) and harm reduction services; and perceived effects of COVID19 on drug use patterns and risk behaviour.
Journal ArticleDOI

Longitudinal study of use and cost of subacromial decompression surgery: the need for effective evaluation of surgical procedures to prevent overtreatment and wasted resources

TL;DR: The use and cost of subacromial decompression in England over the last decade compared with other countries is investigated and how this related to the conduct and outcomes of randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials is explored.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing a framework of quality indicators for healthcare business cases: a qualitative document analysis consolidating insight from expert guidance and current practice

TL;DR: The framework presented in this study has implications for how business cases are developed and evaluated by decision makers, and it would be beneficial to investigate how the framework could be used in practice as a tool for critical appraisal.