Nadia Banteka

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors empirically assess the scope of legal personhood as it relates to AI entities, and make two claims about the problem of AI entity accountability: first, they argue that the courts' overall approach to legal personshood has been more disparate than many have assumed, and it does not support legal personship for AI entities.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the interaction between R2P and the newly advanced concept of Responsibility Not to Veto (RN2V) under two hypotheses: one substantive and one procedural.

TL;DR: The authors argue for a shift in the context of the discussion from one of legal title and ownership to one of negotiation, cooperation, and advancement of both nationalist and internationalist ideals by suggesting an inalienability argument based on Margaret Radin's theory of personhood and a reassessment of the cultural nationalism/internationalism debate through a more modest integrated approach, and new negotiation strategy based on prior successful returns of cultural property objects.

TL;DR: In this paper, a revisionist interpretation of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule doctrine is proposed, which is based on the decision of the Supreme Court in Heien v. North Carolina.

TL;DR: Ithaca as mentioned in this paper is an honorary volume comprising a plethora of remarkable contributions, and the contributors of Ithaca have made this journey enjoyable and worthwhile, as well as the publisher, Ant. N. Sakkoulas, who made this publication possible and who accommodated their every request.