scispace - formally typeset
N

Nathan Andrews

Researcher at University of Northern British Columbia

Publications -  60
Citations -  1149

Nathan Andrews is an academic researcher from University of Northern British Columbia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Corporate social responsibility & Resource curse. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 59 publications receiving 837 citations. Previous affiliations of Nathan Andrews include Queen's University & University of Alberta.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Energy Governance, Transnational Rules, and the Resource Curse: Exploring the Effectiveness of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)

TL;DR: In this article, the effectiveness of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) has been examined for improving governance and economic development outcomes in its member countries using non-parametric tests, regression analysis, and data from the World Bank.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does transparency matter? Evaluating the governance impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Azerbaijan and Liberia

TL;DR: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) has been sold by its advocates as a badly needed way to enhance access to information in the extractive industries sector and improve government accountability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Challenges of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in domestic settings: An exploration of mining regulation vis-à-vis CSR in Ghana

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the domestic institutional dynamics that influence CSR policies and practices in Ghana and emphasize the argument that effective domestic regulation and governance can play a role in ensuring sustainable corporate practices and initiatives, leading to a positive impact on the lives of people living in local mining communities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Linking or de-linking sustainable mining practices and corporate social responsibility? Insights from Ghana

TL;DR: In this article, the authors highlight the discrepancy that exists between practices they consider to be sustainable and the experiences and perceptions of local communities regarding such activities, and suggest that this discrepancy prevails due to the mere focus on land reclamation and other disjointed CSR programs instead of a more nuanced framework that places affected communities at its core.