scispace - formally typeset
N

Nathaniel Hunsu

Researcher at University of Georgia

Publications -  29
Citations -  306

Nathaniel Hunsu is an academic researcher from University of Georgia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Student engagement. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 19 publications receiving 214 citations. Previous affiliations of Nathaniel Hunsu include Washington State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect

TL;DR: It is revealed that knowledge domain, class size, and the use of clicker questions, are among factors that significantly moderated the summary effect sizes observed among the studies in the meta-analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative Effects of Computer-Based Concept Maps, Refutational Texts, and Expository Texts on Science Learning

TL;DR: The concept map group significantly outperformed the refutational and scientific text groups on both free recall and transfer tests, and the theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of the student course cognitive engagement instrument (SCCEI) for college engineering courses

TL;DR: The Student Course Cognitive Engagement Instrument (SCCEI) as discussed by the authors is a quantitative instrument to measure students' in-class cognitive engagement in engineering courses, based on Wylie and Chi's ICAP model of active learning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Examining Approach and Avoidance Valences of the 3 X 2 Achievement Goal Types on an Engineering Student Sample: A Validity Approach.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined empirical support for the construct validity, reliability, and measurement invariance of factors on the 3 X 2 achievement goal questionnaire and compared model fit of the 3X 2 configuration to other alternatives.
Journal ArticleDOI

Issues in transitioning from the traditional blue-book to computer-based writing assessment

TL;DR: In this paper, the transition from the traditional blue book to computer-based writing assessment requires a careful understanding of issues that affect students and raters and that college writing programs must be quipped to manage.