scispace - formally typeset
N

Nick Cavill

Researcher at University of London

Publications -  47
Citations -  2885

Nick Cavill is an academic researcher from University of London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health promotion & Public health. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 47 publications receiving 2582 citations. Previous affiliations of Nick Cavill include University of Strathclyde.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Interventions to promote walking: systematic review

TL;DR: The most successful interventions could increase walking among targeted participants by up to 30-60 minutes a week on average, at least in the short term, from a perspective of improving population health.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment

TL;DR: Evaluating impacts of active travel policies is highly complex; however, many associations can be quantified, and identifying health-maximizing policies and conditions requires integrated HIAs.
Book

Physical Activity and Health in Europe: Evidence for Action

TL;DR: The following countries and regions are represented in the European Union: Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Montenegro, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Uzbekistan.
Journal ArticleDOI

Correlates of physical activity in youth: a review of quantitative systematic reviews

TL;DR: The evidence is suggestive of a number of different types of correlates of PA for children and adolescents, though most are likely to have only small or small-to-moderate effects in isolation and may work best in interaction with other influences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-benefits of designing communities for active living: an exploration of literature

TL;DR: The exploration revealed substantial evidence that designing community environments that make physical activity attractive and convenient is likely to produce additional important benefits, and the extent of the evidence justifies systematic reviews and additional research to fill gaps.