Statistical Analysis With Missing Data (2nd ed.) (Book)

Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in the general population: A systematic review.

Considerable evidence is available in support of an independent association between obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) and cardiovascular disease, which is particularly strong for systemic arterial hypertension and growing for ischaemic heart disease, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and cardiac sudden death. The pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in OSAS is not completely understood but likely to be multifactorial, involving a diverse range of mechanisms including sympathetic nervous system overactivity, selective activation of inflammatory molecular pathways, endothelial dysfunction, abnormal coagulation and metabolic dysregulation, the latter particularly involving insulin resistance and disordered lipid metabolism. The present report, which arose out of a European Union Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research (COST) action on OSAS (COST B26), reviews the current evidence for an independent association and proposes research priorities to identify the underlying mechanisms involved, with a view to identifying novel therapeutic strategies. Large-scale collaborative studies of carefully defined patient populations with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, adequately controlled for potential confounders, are needed. Such studies carry the prospect of evaluating potential interactions between different basic mechanisms operating in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and cardiovascular disease, and interactions with other related disorders, such as obesity, diabetes and dyslipidaemia. Furthermore, translational studies involving cell culture and animal models linked to studies of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome patients are necessary to integrate basic mechanisms with the clinical disorder.

https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/29/1/156.full.pdf

Sleep apnoea as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: current evidence, basic mechanisms and research priorities

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is a common clinical condition in which the throat narrows or collapses repeatedly during sleep, causing obstructive sleep apnoea events. The syndrome is particularly prevalent in middle-aged and older adults. The mechanism by which the upper airway collapses is not fully understood but is multifactorial and includes obesity, craniofacial changes, alteration in upper airway muscle function, pharyngeal neuropathy and fluid shift towards the neck. The direct consequences of the collapse are intermittent hypoxia and hypercapnia, recurrent arousals and increase in respiratory efforts, leading to secondary sympathetic activation, oxidative stress and systemic inflammation. Excessive daytime sleepiness is a burden for the majority of patients. OSAS is also associated with cardiovascular co-morbidities, including hypertension, arrhythmias, stroke, coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis and overall increased cardiovascular mortality, as well as metabolic dysfunction. Whether treating sleep apnoea can fully reverse its chronic consequences remains to be established in adequately designed studies. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the primary treatment modality in patients with severe OSAS, whereas oral appliances are also widely used in mild to moderate forms. Finally, combining different treatment modalities such as CPAP and weight control is beneficial, but need to be evaluated in randomized controlled trials. For an illustrated summary of this Primer, visit: http://go.nature.com/Lwc6te.

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

The link between fatigue and safety

The aim of this study was to compare mandibular advancement device (MAd) therapy and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) after one-night polysomnographic (PSG) titration of both treatments. 59 OSAHS patients (apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI): 34+/-13 events x h(-1); Epworth scale: 10.6+/-4.5) were included in a crossover trial of 8 weeks of MAd and 8 weeks of CPAP after effective titration. Outcome measurements included home sleep study, sleepiness, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), cognitive tests, side-effects, compliance and preference. The median (interquartile range) AHI was 2 (1-8) events x h(-1) with CPAP and 6 (3-14) events x h(-1) with MAd (p 70% of patients preferring this treatment. These results support titrated MAd as an effective therapy in moderately sleepy and overweight OSAHS patients. Although less effective than CPAP, successfully titrated MAd was very effective at reducing the AHI and was associated with a higher reported compliance. Both treatments improved functional outcomes to a similar degree. One-night titration of MAd had a low negative predictive value for treatment success.

https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/34/4/914.full.pdf

Titrated mandibular advancement versus positive airway pressure for sleep apnoea

Long-Term Outcome of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation for Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome

Accidents in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Treated With Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure : A Prospective Study

The aim of this study was to investigate in a large population of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and on long-term treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) the patients' perception of symptomatic improvement, side-effects and quality of life. Questionnaires were mailed via local respiratory homecare associations to 5,339 French patients who had been treated at home for at least 6 months with CPAP machines and who continued their treatment. In total, 3,225 questionnaires were analysable. More than 80% of the responding patients reported that CPAP treatment had greatly improved their symptoms. Despite discomfort related to nasal problems and excess noise from the blower, the mean rate of use for the whole population was 6 h 36 min+/-2 h 15 min. The perceived health evaluated by the Nottingham Health Profile was good (mean score <50) for at least 75% of the patients in each dimension explored. The perceived health was significantly related to the improvement in symptoms, the overall satisfaction and the objective compliance. This retrospective study indicates that patients who continued continuous positive airway pressure treatment for more than 6 months felt a great improvement in their symptoms, were satisfied with the treatment and had a relatively good perception of their health.

https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/12/1/185.full.pdf

Nicole Meslier

Papers

Titrated mandibular advancement versus positive airway pressure for sleep apnoea

Long-Term Outcome of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation for Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome

Accidents in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Treated With Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure : A Prospective Study

A French survey of 3,225 patients treated with CPAP for obstructive sleep apnoea: benefits, tolerance, compliance and quality of life

Microvascular endothelial function in obstructive sleep apnea: Impact of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement.