다중혈관 관상동맥 환자에서 y-문합을 이용하여 양쪽 내흉동맥만을 사용한 우회술의 조기 성적

Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

Machine learning

Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning

Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques

In this Chapter, we imagine a decision maker (or a group of experts) trying to establish or examine fair procedures to combine opinions about alternatives related to different points of view.

Multiple criteria decision making

With the advent of high dimensionality, adequate identification of relevant features of the data has become indispensable in real-world scenarios. In this context, the importance of feature selection is beyond doubt and different methods have been developed. However, with such a vast body of algorithms available, choosing the adequate feature selec- tion method is not an easy-to-solve question and it is necessary to check their effectiveness on different situations. Nevertheless, the assessment of relevant features is difficult in real datasets and so an interesting option is to use artificial data. In this paper, several synthetic datasets are employed for this purpose, aiming at reviewing the performance of feature selec- tion methods in the presence of a crescent number or irrelevant features, noise in the data, redundancy and interaction between attributes, as well as a small ratio between number of samples and number of features. Seven filters, two embedded methods, and two wrappers are applied over eleven synthetic datasets, tested by four classifiers, so as to be able to choose a robust method, paving the way for its application to real datasets.

A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data

https://sci2s.ugr.es/sites/default/files/ficherosPublicaciones/1772_bol14_INS_FS_microarray.pdf

A review of microarray datasets and applied feature selection methods

Adequate selection of features may improve accuracy and efficiency of classifier methods. There are two main approaches for feature selection: wrapper methods, in which the features are selected using the classifier, and filter methods, in which the selection of features is independent of the classifier used. Although the wrapper approach may obtain better performances, it requires greater computational resources. For this reason, lately a new paradigm, hybrid approach, that combines both filter and wrapper methods has emerged. One of its problems is to select the filter method that gives the best relevance index for each case, and this is not an easy to solve question. Different approaches to relevance evaluation lead to a large number of indices for ranking and selection. In this paper, several filter methods are applied over artificial data sets with different number of relevant features, level of noise in the output, interaction between features and increasing number of samples. The results obtained for the four filters studied (ReliefF, Correlation-based Feature Selection, Fast Correlated Based Filter and INTERACT) are compared and discussed. The final aim of this study is to select a filter to construct a hybrid method for feature selection.

Filter methods for feature selection: a comparative study

The explosion of big data has posed important challenges to researchers.Feature selection is paramount when dealing with high-dimensional datasets.We review the state-of-the-art and recent contributions in feature selection.The emerging challenges in feature selection are identified and discussed. In an era of growing data complexity and volume and the advent of big data, feature selection has a key role to play in helping reduce high-dimensionality in machine learning problems. We discuss the origins and importance of feature selection and outline recent contributions in a range of applications, from DNA microarray analysis to face recognition. Recent years have witnessed the creation of vast datasets and it seems clear that these will only continue to grow in size and number. This new big data scenario offers both opportunities and challenges to feature selection researchers, as there is a growing need for scalable yet efficient feature selection methods, given that existing methods are likely to prove inadequate.

Recent advances and emerging challenges of feature selection in the context of big data

Research highlights? A combination of discretizers, filters and classifiers is presented. ? This combination is applied to binary and multiple class classification problems. ? Its performance is compared to KDD Cup winner and other methods results. ? It achieves better performance while significantly reduces the number of features. In this work, a new method consisting of a combination of discretizers, filters and classifiers is presented. Its aim is to improve the performance results of classifiers but using a significantly reduced set of features. The method has been applied to a binary and to a multiple class classification problem. Specifically, the KDD Cup 99 benchmark was used for testing its effectiveness. A comparative study with other methods and the KDD winner was accomplished. The results obtained showed the adequacy of the proposed method, achieving better performance in most cases while reducing the number of features in more than 80%.

Noelia Sánchez-Maroño

Papers

A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data

A review of microarray datasets and applied feature selection methods

Filter methods for feature selection: a comparative study

Recent advances and emerging challenges of feature selection in the context of big data

Feature selection and classification in multiple class datasets