O
Osman Hasan
Researcher at University of the Sciences
Publications - 307
Citations - 3297
Osman Hasan is an academic researcher from University of the Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Automated theorem proving & Formal verification. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 295 publications receiving 2671 citations. Previous affiliations of Osman Hasan include Vienna University of Technology & Concordia University Wisconsin.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
RRT ∗ -Smart: Rapid convergence implementation of RRT ∗ towards optimal solution
TL;DR: An extension of RRT, called RRT*-Smart, is proposed, which aims to accelerate its rate of convergence and to reach an optimum or near optimum solution at a much faster rate and at a reduced execution time.
Journal ArticleDOI
RRT*-SMART: A Rapid Convergence Implementation of RRT*
Jauwairia Nasir,Fahad Islam,Usman Malik,Yasar Ayaz,Osman Hasan,Mushtaq Khan,Mannan Saeed Muhammad,Mannan Saeed Muhammad +7 more
TL;DR: The goal of the proposed RRT*-Smart method is to accelerate the rate of convergence, in order to reach an optimum or near optimum solution at a much faster rate, thus reducing the execution time.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reliability modeling and analysis of communication networks
TL;DR: This is the first in-depth review of the application of reliability modeling and analysis techniques in communication networks and critically evaluate the pros and cons of different approaches.
Journal ArticleDOI
Probabilistic Error Modeling for Approximate Adders
TL;DR: A generic methodology for analytical modeling of probability of occurrence of error and the Probability Mass Function of error value in a selected class of approximate adders is presented, which can serve as performance metrics for the comparative analysis of various adders and their configurations.
Book ChapterDOI
Formal Verification Methods
Osman Hasan,Sofiène Tahar +1 more
TL;DR: In the case of the A330 aircraft, the automatic reporting system sent messages indicating disagreement in the airspeed readings, which led investigators to believe that the pilot probe sensors did not “accurately” measure airspeed and the autopilot may have automatically disengaged as discussed by the authors.