scispace - formally typeset
P

Phillip L. De Leon

Researcher at New Mexico State University

Publications -  49
Citations -  971

Phillip L. De Leon is an academic researcher from New Mexico State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Speaker recognition & Instantaneous phase. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 46 publications receiving 844 citations. Previous affiliations of Phillip L. De Leon include University of Colorado Boulder & University of Edinburgh.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of Speaker Verification Security and Detection of HMM-Based Synthetic Speech

TL;DR: A new feature based on relative phase shift (RPS) is proposed, demonstrated reliable detection of synthetic speech, and shown how this classifier can be used to improve security of SV systems.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Detection of synthetic speech for the problem of imposture

TL;DR: A HMM-based speech synthesizer is used, which creates synthetic speech for a targeted speaker through adaptation of a background model and both GMM-UBM and support vector machine (SVM) SV systems are used, reducing the vulnerability of a speaker verification (SV) system to synthetic speech.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anti-spoofing for text-independent speaker verification: an initial database, comparison of countermeasures, and human performance

TL;DR: This paper starts with a thorough analysis of the spoofing effects of five speech synthesis and eight voice conversion systems, and the vulnerability of three speaker verification systems under those attacks, and introduces a number of countermeasures to prevent spoofing attacks.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Synthetic Speech Discrimination using Pitch Pattern Statistics Derived from Image Analysis

TL;DR: The classifier is trained using synthetic speech collected from the 2008 and 2011 Blizzard Challenge along with Festival pre-built voices and human speech from the NIST2002 corpus to discriminate between human and synthetic speech using features based on pitch patterns.
Book ChapterDOI

Speaker Recognition Anti-spoofing

TL;DR: The literature shows that there is significant potential for automatic speaker verification systems to be spoofed, that significant further work is required to develop generalised countermeasures, there is a need for standard datasets, evaluation protocols and metrics and that greater emphasis should be placed on text-dependent scenarios.