scispace - formally typeset
R

Rebecca Walker Naylor

Researcher at Ohio State University

Publications -  6
Citations -  1296

Rebecca Walker Naylor is an academic researcher from Ohio State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Supply chain & Reciprocal determinism. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 6 publications receiving 1108 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors demonstrate that consumers associate higher product ethicality with gentleness-related attributes and lower product ethics with strength-related ones, and as a consequence, the positive effect of product sustainability on consumer preferences is reduced when strengthrelated attributes are valued, sometimes even resulting in preferences for less sustainable product alternatives.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the potential of a theoretical framework, based on social cognitive theory (SCT), to inspire future research into sustainable consumption, which provides a dynamic perspective on sustainable consumption through exploring the interactive nature of personal, environmental and behavioral factors of consumption.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using Behavioral Experiments to Expand Our Horizons and Deepen Our Understanding of Logistics and Supply Chain Decision Making

TL;DR: In this paper, behavioral experiments represent a potentially valuable and currently underutilized approach for gaining insight into logistics and supply chain decision making that is commonly characterized by departures from rational thought.
Journal ArticleDOI

Same destination, different paths: When and how does observing others' choices and reasoning alter confidence in our own choices?

TL;DR: This article found that consumers' confidence in their publically stated choices can be diminished if observed others make the same choice but justify the choice using different reasoning, rather than due to a desire to affiliate with the observed other.