scispace - formally typeset
R

Ren-Cun Jin

Researcher at Zhejiang University

Publications -  12
Citations -  1211

Ren-Cun Jin is an academic researcher from Zhejiang University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Anammox & Nitrification. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 12 publications receiving 1004 citations. Previous affiliations of Ren-Cun Jin include Hangzhou Normal University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The inhibition of the Anammox process: A review

TL;DR: In this paper, a detailed review of previous researches on the inhibition of Anammox processes is presented, where the effect of inhibitory substances, such as substrates (ammonia and nitrite), organic matter (nontoxic organic matter and toxic organic matter), salts, heavy metals, phosphate and sulfide, are commonly present in the practical applications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Performance comparison of two anammox reactors: SBR and UBF

TL;DR: In this article, the performance of two selected high rate anammox reactors, i.e., sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and an upflow biofilter (UBF), were compared operating them simultaneously at 30 °C.
Journal Article

Lab Scale Studies on Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes Marts Solms) for Biotreatment of Textile Wastewater

TL;DR: In this article, a lab scale study was conducted to test the feasibility of water hyacinth for treating textile wastewater, which showed a significant reduction in all the pollutants with the passage of time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anammox in a UASB reactor treating saline wastewater

TL;DR: The results of continuous-flow experiment revealed that under the salinity of 30 g NaCl l −1 the reactor performed well and the substrate removal capacity was comparable to the condition of freshwater, however, the anammox UASB bioreactor was prone to malfunction under transient operating conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantitative comparison of stability of ANAMMOX process in different reactor configurations

TL;DR: The results showed that all ANAMMOX reactors under investigation were more tolerant to the hydraulic shock than substrate concentration shock, and the ASBR proved the most tolerant to hydraulic shock, followed by the UASB reactor and USFF reactor.