scispace - formally typeset
R

Rhona Flin

Researcher at Robert Gordon University

Publications -  287
Citations -  21719

Rhona Flin is an academic researcher from Robert Gordon University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Patient safety & Teamwork. The author has an hindex of 74, co-authored 282 publications receiving 20088 citations. Previous affiliations of Rhona Flin include Memorial University of Newfoundland & University of Aberdeen.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features☆

TL;DR: The most commonly assessed dimensions relate to management (72% of studies), the safety system (67%) and risk (67%), in addition themes relating to work pressure and competence appear in a third of the studies as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anaesthetists’ Non‐Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system†

TL;DR: The findings of the evaluation indicated that the ANTS system has a satisfactory level of validity, reliability and usability in an experimental setting, provided users receive adequate training.
Book

Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills

TL;DR: Safety at the Sharp End as discussed by the authors is a general guide to the theory and practice of non-technical skills for safety, including cognitive and social skills required for efficient and safe operations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments

TL;DR: In this paper, the associations between management practices and climate scores with official accident statistics and self-reported accident involvement were tested via a series of hypotheses, which indicated that safety management practices were associated with lower official accident rates and fewer respondents reporting accidents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature

TL;DR: The existing frameworks used to measure surgeons' non-technical skills were found to be deficient in terms of either their psychometric properties or suitability for rating the full range of skills in individual surgeons.